MHB How to Extend These Vectors to a Basis in $\mathbb{R}^4$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Vectors
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $t\in \mathbb{R}$ and the vectors $$v_1=\begin{pmatrix}
0\\
1\\
-1\\
1
\end{pmatrix}, v_2=\begin{pmatrix}
t\\
2\\
0\\
1
\end{pmatrix}, v_3=\begin{pmatrix}
2\\
2\\
2\\
0
\end{pmatrix}$$ in $\mathbb{R}^4$.

I want to determine a maximal linearly independent subset of $\{v_1, v_2, v_3\}$ and to extend these to a basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$.
I have done the following:
$$\begin{pmatrix}
0 & t & 2 \\
1 & 2 & 2 \\
-1 & 0 & 2 \\
1 & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
-1 & 0 & 2 \\
1 & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 0 & 2t-2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$$

If $t\neq 1$ we get the following system: $$\lambda_1+2\lambda_2+2\lambda_3=0 \\ t\lambda_2+2\lambda_3=0 \\ (2t-2)\lambda_3=0$$
So, $\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda_3=0$ and so the vectors are linearly independent.

If $t=1$ we get the system: $$\lambda_1+2\lambda_2+2\lambda_3=0 \\ \lambda_2+2\lambda_3=0=0$$
So, $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3)=\lambda_3 (2, -2, 1), \lambda_3\in \mathbb{R}$.
Therefore, $v_3=-2v_1+2v_2$ and $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent. Is everything correct so far? (Wondering)

So do we get a different maximal linearly independent subset for $t=1$ and a different for $t\neq 1$ ? (Wondering) So, do we have to take cases for $t$ to extend the vectors to a basis? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or, since we are looking for the maximal linearly independent subset of $\{v_1,v_2,v_3\}$, we take the case $t\neq 1$, because then the linearly independent subset is the whole set? (Wondering)
 
There is a typo at the first post...

The vectors are\begin{equation*}v_1=\begin{pmatrix}
0\\
1\\
-1\\
t
\end{pmatrix}, v_2=\begin{pmatrix}
t\\
2\\
0\\
1
\end{pmatrix}, v_3=\begin{pmatrix}
2\\
2\\
2\\
0
\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*} in $\mathbb{R}^4$.

We have the following:
\begin{align*}&\begin{pmatrix}
0 & t & 2 \\
1 & 2 & 2 \\
-1 & 0 & 2 \\
t & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 2 & 4 \\
t & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & 1-2t & -2t
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & 2t & 2+2t
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & t & 1+t
\end{pmatrix}\\ &\overset{ t\neq 1}{\rightarrow } \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & t & 2 \\
0 & 0 & t-1
\end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 2 \\
0 & 0 & t-1 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}\end{align*} So, for $t\neq 1$ the $3$ vectors are linearly independent.

For $t=1$ we get fpr example $v_3=-2v_1+2v_2$, where $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent.

About extending the basis I have done the following:
When $t\neq 1$ :
We need one more vector. We write the given vectors as lilnes of a matrix and we add also a zero line:
\begin{equation*}\begin{pmatrix}
0 &
1&
-1 &
t
\\ t& 2& 0& 1 \\ 2&
2&
2&
0\\ 0&0&0&0
\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}We have to bring the matrix into a row-echelon form \begin{equation*}\begin{pmatrix}
2 &
2&
2 & 0
\\ 0& 1& -1&t \\ 0 &
0&
4-4t&
2t^2-4t+2\\ 0&0&0&0
\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}At the diagonals we write the element $1$ :
\begin{equation*}\begin{pmatrix}
2 &
2&
2 & 0
\\ 0& 1& -1&t \\ 0 &
0&
4-4t&
2t^2-4t+2\\ 0&0&0&1
\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}

So, the vectors \begin{equation*}\begin{pmatrix}
0 \\
1\\
-1 \\ t\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix}
t\\ 2\\ 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix} , \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\
2\\
2\\
0\end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix}0\\ 0\\ 0\\ 1
\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*} form a basis.

Is this correct? (Wondering)
 
Hey mathmari! (Smile)

Let's bring the matrix in column echelon form instead of row echelon form. (Thinking)

$$\begin{array}{}
\quad \times \quad \phantom{0} \quad -t \\
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & t \\
1 & 1 & 2 \\
1 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 1
\end{pmatrix} \to
\end{array}

\begin{array}{}
\quad \phantom{0} \quad \times \quad t-2 \\
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
1 & 1 & 2-t \\
1 & -1 & -t \\
0 & 1 & 1
\end{pmatrix} \to
\end{array}

\begin{array}{}
\phantom{0} \\
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
1 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & -1 & -2(t-1) \\
0 & 1 & t-1
\end{pmatrix}
\end{array}
$$

The columns are now our independent vectors.
For $t=1$ the third column is the 0 vector, showing that we have a dependent set, and furthermore the first 2 columns form an independent basis.
For $t\ne 1$, the third column is an independent vector with non-zero entries in the 3rd and 4th rows.

That means we can complete the basis by adding a 4th column that completes the column echelon form:
$$
\to\left(\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
1 & 1 & 0 & 0\\
1 & -1 & -2(t-1) & 0 \\
0 & 1 & t-1 & 1
\end{array}\right)
$$

So indeed, we can pick \begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\0\\1\end{pmatrix} as the 4th basis vector. (Happy)
 
Ah ok... Thank you very much! (Smile)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K