How to Factor 1 Trillion into Two Numbers Without Zeroes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cesius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on factoring 1 trillion (10^12) into two numbers without any zeroes. The correct factorization is 5^12 x 2^12, which equals 244140625 x 4096, but both components contain zeroes. The participants clarify that the riddle allows for non-integer factors, leading to the alternative solution of 262,144 x 3,814,697.266, which is valid as it does not contain any zeroes. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions of numbers in different contexts, particularly between American and British interpretations of "trillion."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime factorization
  • Familiarity with the concept of integers versus decimals
  • Knowledge of the American and British numbering systems
  • Basic arithmetic operations and properties of numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of prime factorization in number theory
  • Explore the differences between American and British numerical terminology
  • Learn about the implications of using decimals in mathematical problems
  • Study examples of mathematical riddles involving constraints on factors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students, and puzzle enthusiasts interested in number theory and mathematical problem-solving.

Cesius
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me how to factor 1 trillion in 2 numbers, and none of them have zeroes in them?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The two numbers I got were 262,144 x 3,814,697.266 and 5^12 x 2^12. I'm not sure which one is right because the first one I'm not sure if it's exact and the second one technically has zeroes.
 
Cesius said:
The two numbers I got were 262,144 x 3,814,697.266 and 5^12 x 2^12. I'm not sure which one is right because the first one I'm not sure if it's exact and the second one technically has zeroes.

Usually in riddles of this nature the "two numbers" are assumed to be integers.

Perhaps the riddle meant the British definition of "trillion", 10^18, in which case your factors would be 2^18 and 5^18, (262144 and 3814697265625).
 
I'm American, and it's an American school so I'm pretty sure it mean 10^12.

Thanks though.
 
It's straightforward to prove that 5^12 x 2^12 is the only factorization into two factors such that neither of the two ends with zero. (Because any factor that has a 2 and a 5 would be divisible by ten.)
 
It's not that it can't end in zero, it just can't have any zeros in it.
 
Then some trick must be involved. Either you're allowed to use non-integer factors, or you're allowed to use non-decimal systems.
 
2^12= 4096 and 5^12= 244140625, both of which have 0s so [math](2^12)(5^12([/math] and with any other two factors at least one would have to have factors of "2" and "5" and so be a multiple of 10.
 
1*1717914916

Edit: on the second reading I see hamster already hinted at this solution.
 
  • #10
Borek said:
1*1717914916

Isn't this sum wrong anyway, as 1 trillion (either long or short scale), 10 and 16 are all co-prime to 2, so it cannot end in an odd "digit"? ;)
 
  • #11
No idea what have happened, obviously some finger slip on my side. 1*34771513724319 looks much better.
 
  • #12
Cesius said:
The two numbers I got were 262,144 x 3,814,697.266 and 5^12 x 2^12. I'm not sure which one is right because the first one I'm not sure if it's exact and the second one technically has zeroes.

262,144 x 3814697.265625 works if one is allowed decimals.
 
  • #13
We are allowed decimals. Thanks for the answers Astronuc! And thanks for the help everyone!
 
  • #14
It would have helped if you had told us that to begin with! You said "factor one trillion" and that usually means into integer factors.
 
  • #15
Try this: Factor 611939 into two different integer factors. ;)

^^
 
  • #16
Cesius said:
We are allowed decimals. Thanks for the answers Astronuc! And thanks for the help everyone!
You're welcome. I was wondering if one had to have integers which would be impossible given the constraints. I just start dividing 512 by 2 until I found a number without zeros.

On the other hand, one can also divide 212 by 5's, in which case only one division is needed 212/5 = 819.2 and 48828125 = 511.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K