How to find drag polar equation of Cl vs Cd graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter MattH150197
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Graph Polar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the drag polar equation from a plotted drag coefficient (Cd) versus lift coefficient (Cl) graph for an aircraft. The primary equation discussed is CD = CD0 + K * CL^2, where CD0 represents the drag coefficient at zero lift. The participants suggest that a better fit for the data may be Cl = Cl0 + k(Cd - 0.4)^2, with Cl0 approximated at 0.184. Additionally, the importance of correctly identifying the tangent line to maximize the lift-to-drag ratio is emphasized, alongside the need to switch the axes of the plotted graph.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of drag polar equations in aerodynamics
  • Familiarity with regression analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of plotting and interpreting graphs in aerodynamics
  • Basic principles of lift and drag coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and application of drag polar equations in aerodynamics
  • Learn about regression analysis methods for curve fitting in experimental data
  • Study the significance of the lift-to-drag ratio in aircraft performance
  • Explore the impact of varying Cl0 values on drag polar curve fitting
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, students studying aerodynamics, and researchers analyzing aircraft performance metrics will benefit from this discussion.

MattH150197
Messages
60
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I plotted the drag polar graph (Drag coefficient vs. lift coefficient) for an aircraft and are required to find the equation of the drag polar to determine values for [C][/D0] and k, using the graph or any other method. I've plotted the graph which I've included.

Homework Equations


CD=CDO+K*CL^2 [/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that CD0 is the point at which the graph intersects the x-axis but what is k is it the gradient of the linear part of the graph? And what is the other method of analysing it, just out of curiosity. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • drag co. v lift co..png
    drag co. v lift co..png
    7.8 KB · Views: 4,817
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no good fit of the data to an equation of the form Cd = Cd0 + k(Cl2).
There is a better fit of the data to a curve of the form Cl = Cl0 + k(Cd-0.4)2.
Approximately Cl = 0.184 + 0.4×(Cd-0.4)2

I wonder if you are being asked to determine the tangent line from (0,0) to the curve. That gives the greatest lift-to-drag ratio. That would be the line from (0,0) to about (0.275, 0.82).

EDIT: The OP noticed that the chart had the lift and drag axis switched. So all the lift and drag coefficients in this should have been switched.
 
Last edited:
What about if like you said I draw a tangent line and then simply allied y=mx + c so y = Cd m = k, x = Cl^2, c = Cdo do you think that would be correct?
 
MattH150197 said:
What about if like you said I draw a tangent line and then simply allied y=mx + c so y = Cd m = k, x = Cl^2, c = Cdo do you think that would be correct?
Not exactly. Instead of Cl2, it must be (Cl - Cl0)2, where Cl0 is the minimal lift value. See the equation in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_polar
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MattH150197
Just eyeballing the original data, I don't see why the regression didn't give (approximately) Cd0 = .25, Cl0 = 0.4 and k = 0.3. I wonder if I did the regression correctly. Or maybe it is sensitive to the original choice of Cl0 = 0.4 (which was eyeballed). Maybe Cl0 = 0.45 would have fit the upper Cl values better. The lower Cl values do not fit the model well. They are too low.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K