How to Find Ψ(x,t) for a Given Hamiltonian Matrix and Initial State?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the wave function Ψ(x,t) for a quantum system described by a given Hamiltonian matrix. The original poster presents a Hamiltonian matrix and an initial state vector, seeking guidance on how to derive Ψ(x,t) from these components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the diagonalization of the Hamiltonian and the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. There are questions about the correctness of the eigenvalues and the normalization of eigenvectors. Some participants express uncertainty about how to express the initial state as a linear combination of the eigenvectors and how to incorporate time dependence into the wave function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on calculations and suggesting methods for finding coefficients for the linear combination of eigenvectors. There is a focus on clarifying mathematical steps and ensuring correct interpretations of the eigenvalue equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential complications arising from the calculations of eigenvectors and the normalization process. There is also mention of different examples being used, indicating variability in the complexity of the problems being discussed.

Mlisjak
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have the matrix form of the Hamiltonian:

H = ( 1 2-i
2+i 3)

If in the t=0, system is in the state a = (1 0)T, what is Ψ(x,t)?

Homework Equations



Eigenvalue equation

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I have diagonalized given matrix and got the eigenvalues: 2+√6 and 2-√6. I am suspecting that these are not good, since I can't get eigenvectors I can use. When trying to calculate eigenvectors, I get:
a = 1 and b=(-1+√6)/(2+i). This is the one I got when I used 2+√6 but after that I didn't even try with the other eigenvalue since it will be similar.
I don't know what to do with those and don't know how to normalize them. Also, even if I knew how to get correct eigenvectors, I am not sure how to proceed and get Ψ(x,t). [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how you got that value for b (I don't get the same signs), so check your math. If what bothers you is the (2+i) in the denominator, simply multiply by (2-i)/(2-i).
 
Do you get the same eigenvalues? I put it in the form:
( 1 2-i
2+i 3 ) * (a b)t = (2+√6) (a b)T

I'm sorry, I don't know to write it properly.

Then I got:
a+(2-i)b = (2+√6)a
That's where the expression comes from. And by using the second equation i got a=a in which cases we always put 1 in our class. Is that wrong?
 
Mlisjak said:
a+(2-i)b = (2+√6)a
That's where the expression comes from. And by using the second equation i got a=a in which cases we always put 1 in our class.
That gives
$$
b = \frac{1 + \sqrt{6}}{2 - i}
$$
which is not what you wrote above.

Try multiplying with ##(2 + i)/(2 + i)##.
 
Ok, I got the vectors but don't know how to proceed to get Ψ (x,t)
 
What have you learned about time evolution?
 
To be precise, I don't understand how to get right coefficients to write Ψ(x,0) as a linear combination of the vectors I got. When i get that, I believe that I just have to add time dependence e-iEt/†
 
Scalar product. You have found the eigenvectors φ1 and φ2 and want to write Ψ(t=0) = c1 φ1 + c2 φ2, you find the coefficients using
$$
c_n = \phi_n^\dagger \Psi
$$
 
Is that equal to finding the norm of the eigenvectors? For example, I have three eigenvectors: v1 = v2 = (1 0 0) and v3=1/√2 (0 -i 1).

Would I write Ψo= 2*(1 0 0)+1/√2 (0 -i 1)?
 
  • #10
I have used different example, since I get too complicated vectors in the exercise I posted originally
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K