How to find the acceleration due to gravity inside a planet?

Click For Summary
To find the acceleration due to gravity inside a uniform spherical planet, the expression for g(R) is derived as g(R) = Gp(4/3)πR, where R is the distance from the center of the planet. The confusion arises from using the same symbol R for both the planet's radius and the variable distance, which can lead to misunderstandings. Newton's Shell Theorem indicates that only the mass enclosed within the radius R contributes to the gravitational force experienced by an object inside the planet. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear notation and understanding the implications of the shell theorem in gravitational calculations. Overall, the correct application of these concepts leads to a better understanding of gravity's behavior within a planet.
Johnnie123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the formatting template for all homework help requests
Consider a spherical planet of uniform density ρ. The distance from the planet's center to its surface (i.e., the planet's radius) is R. An object is located a distance R from the center of the planet, where R < Rp. (The object is located inside of the planet.)

1) Find an expression for the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, g(R), inside the planet.

2) Rewrite your result for g(R) in terms of gp, the gravitational acceleration at the surface of the planet, times a function of R.

Relevant equations:

$$g = \frac{GM}{R^2}$$


So, I have seen this question on the forum before, but I am still unsure about the concept.

For 1, I found $$g(R) = \frac{Gp(4/3)*π*R^3}{R^2}$$, which is the correct answer. However, I do not understand why R^3 in the numerator is R^3 and not (R_p)^3. In the equation $$g = \frac{GM}{R^2}$$ M is the entire mass of the planet or spherical body. Wouldn't that require $$M=p*(4/3)*π*R^3$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the math so I can't tell but - are you taking into account Newton's Shell Theorem?
 
Johnnie123 said:
Consider a spherical planet of uniform density ρ. The distance from the planet's center to its surface (i.e., the planet's radius) is R. An object is located a distance R from the center of the planet, where R < Rp. (The object is located inside of the planet.)

1) Find an expression for the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, g(R), inside the planet.

2) Rewrite your result for g(R) in terms of gp, the gravitational acceleration at the surface of the planet, times a function of R.

Relevant equations:

$$g = \frac{GM}{R^2}$$


So, I have seen this question on the forum before, but I am still unsure about the concept.

For 1, I found $$g(R) = \frac{Gp(4/3)*π*R^3}{R^2}$$, which is the correct answer. However, I do not understand why R^3 in the numerator is R^3 and not (R_p)^3. In the equation $$g = \frac{GM}{R^2}$$ M is the entire mass of the planet or spherical body. Wouldn't that require $$M=p*(4/3)*π*R^3$$

Your post is difficult to understand because you seem to use the same letters for different quantities, starting with ##R## being the radius of the planet and ##R## also being the variable distance from the centre.

You could use ##r## for the variable radius and ##m## for the mass enclosed by a shell of radius ##r##.

In answer to your question, when you are inside the planet, is the entire mass of the planet pulling the object towards the centre?

The post above, pointing you at the shell theorem is a good hint.
 
PeroK said:
Your post is difficult to understand because you seem to use the same letters for different quantities, starting with ##R## being the radius of the planet and ##R## also being the variable distance from the centre.
Ah. OK. I thought maybe what he was demoing was just beyond me.:smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K