How to Find the Apothem of a Regular Polygon

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Office_Shredder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Sums
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the apothem of a regular polygon through various mathematical approaches, including summation of sine functions and geometric interpretations. Participants explore different methods of calculation and reasoning, touching on both algebraic and geometric perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a proof involving the summation of sine functions and provides a detailed calculation leading to the expression for the cotangent.
  • Another participant presents an alternative calculation using a telescoping series to derive a relationship involving cosine functions.
  • Some participants express interest in finding additional methods for the calculation, indicating a desire for exploration beyond the presented solutions.
  • A participant suggests a geometric interpretation, relating the sum of sines to the distance between opposite sides of a regular polygon, which leads to a formula for the apothem.
  • One participant describes a complicated inductive approach but expresses uncertainty about its correctness, inviting others to verify the method.
  • Another participant reiterates the geometric explanation, emphasizing the relationship between sine functions and the vertical projections in the context of a regular polygon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method for finding the apothem, as multiple approaches and interpretations are presented. The discussion remains open-ended with various competing views and methods being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations rely on specific assumptions about the properties of sine and cosine functions, and the geometric interpretations depend on the understanding of regular polygons and their apothems. There are unresolved mathematical steps in the inductive approach mentioned by one participant.

Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,706
Reaction score
1,592
Prove that
\sum_{k=0}^{n} \sin\left( \frac{k \pi}{n} \right) = \cot \left( \frac{\pi}{2n} \right)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a fairly straightforward calculation:

\begin{align*}\sum_{k=0}^{n} \sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right) &amp;= \Im \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n} \exp \left(\frac{k\pi i}{n} \right) \right) \\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left( \frac{1 - \exp \left(\frac{(n+1)\pi i}{n}\right)}{1 - \exp \left(\frac{\pi i}{n}\right)}\right)\\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left( \frac{1+\exp \left(\frac{\pi i}{n}\right)}{1 - \exp \left(\frac{\pi i}{n}\right)}\right)\\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left(\frac{\exp \left(-\frac{\pi i}{2n}\right) + \exp \left(\frac{\pi i}{2n} \right)}{\exp \left(-\frac{\pi i}{2n}\right) - \exp \left(\frac{\pi i}{2n}\right)}\right) \\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left(\frac{2 \cos \left(-\frac{\pi }{2n}\right)}{2i \sin \left(-\frac{\pi}{2n} \right)}\right) \\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left(-i \cot \left(-\frac{\pi}{2n} \right) \right) \\<br /> &amp;= \Im \left(i \cot \left(\frac{\pi}{2n} \right)\right) \\<br /> &amp;= \cot \left(\frac{\pi}{2n} \right) \end{align*}
 
Here's another calculation:
$$\begin{align}
\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right) \sum_{k=0}^{n} \sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right)
&= \sum_{k=0}^{n} \sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right) \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right) \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \left[ \cos\left( \frac{(2k-1)\pi}{2n}\right) - \cos\left(\frac{(2k+1)\pi}{2n}\right) \right] \\
\end{align}$$
The sum telescopes, so the above reduces to
$$\begin{align}
\frac{1}{2} \left[ \cos\left(-\frac{\pi}{2n}\right) - \cos\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi}{2n}\right) \right]
&= \frac{1}{2}\left[ \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right) - \cos\left(\pi + \frac{\pi}{2n}\right) \right] \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left[\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right) + \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right)\right] \\
&= \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right)
\end{align}$$
Dividing both sides by ##\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2n}\right)## gives us what we want.
 
Those are some nice solutions! Anyone have another way of doing the calculation?
 
The sum is also the distance between opposite sides of a regular polygon with 2n sides of length 1, from where the result comes with simple geometry.
 
I stumbled upon a really complicated way to d0 it by induction... too tired now to do the arithmetic and see if it works right now. After easily establishing that both sides equal 0 for n=1, it involves turning the right side into the form (e^ipi/n + 1)/(e^ipi/n -1) and multiplying the numerator and the denominator by e to the power of (i*pi/n^2)/(1+1/n) which turns the denominator of the exponent into n+1 without changing the numerator, but it changes the 1 on the numerator and the -1 in the denominator so you must add something to make them turn back into 1 and -1 without changing the e^ipi/n+1's. So add A/B to that and solve for A and B and then add A/B to the other side and see if you can get it in the n+1 form. Is that on the right track?
 
CosmicKitten said:
I stumbled upon a really complicated way to d0 it by induction... too tired now to do the arithmetic and see if it works right now. After easily establishing that both sides equal 0 for n=1, it involves turning the right side into the form (e^ipi/n + 1)/(e^ipi/n -1) and multiplying the numerator and the denominator by e to the power of (i*pi/n^2)/(1+1/n) which turns the denominator of the exponent into n+1 without changing the numerator, but it changes the 1 on the numerator and the -1 in the denominator so you must add something to make them turn back into 1 and -1 without changing the e^ipi/n+1's. So add A/B to that and solve for A and B and then add A/B to the other side and see if you can get it in the n+1 form. Is that on the right track?

It might work, why don't you try going through the details to see if you can hammer it out?

chingel, that's a pretty cool way of attacking this problem. Can you explain a bit more how the geometry works out to give it?
 
Since on an x-y plane the sine is the vertical projection of a segment of length 1 at a particular angle and we are trying to find the sum of sines, that is the sum of the vertical projections, we can add up all the segments and then find the vertical projection of the sum. Noticing that the angles increase with regular intervals and that the segments make up half of an 2n-gon, then the vertical projection of the sum is just twice the apothem of the 2n-gon and using the well known simple formula for the apothem we get the answer.

http://www.buzzle.com/articles/finding-apothem-of-a-regular-polygon.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
chingel said:
Since on an x-y plane the sine is the vertical projection of a segment of length 1 at a particular angle and we are trying to find the sum of sines, that is the sum of the vertical projections, we can add up all the segments and then find the vertical projection of the sum. Noticing that the angles increase with regular intervals and that the segments make up half of an 2n-gon, then the vertical projection of the sum is just twice the apothem of the 2n-gon and using the well known simple formula for the apothem we get the answer.

http://www.buzzle.com/articles/finding-apothem-of-a-regular-polygon.html

This is a very cool proof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K