How to find the decay rate of processes: a→ b+c

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the decay rate of a particle decay process represented as a → b + c, specifically focusing on iso-spin states and their relationships in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevant equations needed for the decay process and the normalization of states. Some express uncertainty about the methods and seek explanations, while others provide insights into the relationships between the states and decay rates.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the necessary equations and the importance of normalization in the context of decay rate ratios. Some participants emphasize that normalization may not be critical for the ratio itself, while others suggest that understanding the equations is essential for progress.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information regarding textbooks or resources that could provide foundational knowledge for the participants. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the topic and the equations involved.

Jamiemma1995
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Show using isospin symmetry that the probabilities of the decays ∆+ → π^+n and ∆+ → π_0p are expected to be in the ratio

Γ(∆+ → π^+n)/ Γ(∆+ → π_0p)=1 /2

I unfortunately missed the classes that covered this last week due to severe health problems , I don't want anyone to solve it for me I want to learn , but my problem is I don't know how to find the decay rate of processes. Could anyone please explain the method, and give the relevant equations and then I can work it out for myself .
Relevant Equations
N.A.
As mentioned above I'm unable to begin because I don't know the relevant equations or method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the following equations for the relevant iso-spin states:
[tex]|\pi^{+}n\rangle \equiv |1, 1 \rangle |\frac{1}{2} , - \frac{1}{2} \rangle = \sqrt {\frac{1}{3}} \ | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} \rangle + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \ | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} \rangle ,[/tex][tex]|\pi^{0}p \rangle \equiv |1 , 0 \rangle |\frac{1}{2} , + \frac{1}{2} \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \ |\frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} \rangle - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \ |\frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2}\rangle .[/tex] Now, solve these equations for [itex]|\Delta^{+} \rangle \equiv |\frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} \rangle[/itex] and obtain equation of the form [tex]|\Delta^{+} \rangle = a \ |\pi^{+}n\rangle + b \ |\pi^{0}p \rangle .[/tex] Make sure that [itex]|a|^{2} + |b|^{2} = 1[/itex]. Now [tex]\frac{\Gamma ( \Delta^{+} \to \pi^{+} n )}{ \Gamma ( \Delta^{+} \to \pi^{0} p )} = \frac{|a|^{2}}{|b|^{2}} .[/tex]
 
samalkhaiat said:
Make sure that [itex]|a|^{2} + |b|^{2} = 1[/itex].
Normalising the state is generally a good advice, but not that relevant here since the sought result is a decay rate ratio.
 
Jamiemma1995 said:
Could anyone please explain the method, and give the relevant equations and then I can work it out for myself?
Don't you have a textbook? I'm sure it explains how to do this kind of calculation as well as giving examples.
 
Orodruin said:
Normalising the state is generally a good advice, but not that relevant here since the sought result is a decay rate ratio.
The advice was about solving the equations correctly. Normalization is not the issue here, [itex]10^{23}|\Delta^{+}\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|\Delta^{+}\rangle[/itex] lead to the same ratio. However, obtaining [itex]a^{2} + b^{2} = 1[/itex] means that his solution is definitely correct.
 
samalkhaiat said:
The advice was about solving the equations correctly. Normalization is not the issue here, [itex]10^{23}|\Delta^{+}\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|\Delta^{+}\rangle[/itex] lead to the same ratio. However, obtaining [itex]a^{2} + b^{2} = 1[/itex] means that his solution is definitely correct.
It is correct either way if you include the argument with the ratio. In fact, it is a very common way and important tool when solving for ratios to only care about proportionality and not the constant in front.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K