How to Find the Electric Field Inside a Partially Hollow Charged Sphere?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the electric field inside a partially hollow charged sphere, characterized by a uniform charge density except for a hollow region at the center. The original poster attempts to apply Gauss's law using a spherical Gaussian surface to analyze the electric field in different regions of the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss's law, questioning how to account for the hollow region and the charge distribution. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the electric field and the charge enclosed within different Gaussian surfaces.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the setup of Gaussian surfaces in various regions, and participants are exploring the implications of charge density and the geometry of the problem. There is an ongoing dialogue about the correct labeling of variables and the application of formulas related to electric fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to adjust variable labels to avoid confusion, particularly distinguishing between the radius of the hollow sphere, the radius of the Gaussian surface, and the radius of the charged sphere. There is also mention of the need to account for the 'missing charge' due to the hollow sphere in calculations.

886363
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sphere with radius r has uniform charge density ρ within its volume, except for a small hollow sphere located at the center with radius R. Find the electrical field.


Homework Equations


ρ=Q/V
∫∫EdS=Q/ε

The Attempt at a Solution


With the spherical Gaussian surface with radius r:
E4 \pi r^2=\dfrac{\rho \frac{4\pi r^3}{3}}{\epsilon}

Is it just a case of finding the electric field from setting a Gaussian surface to the hollow sphere as well and subtracting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to do any fancy subtractions.

Set your Gaussian surfaces in the hollow part, in the charged part, and outside the charged part. E will differ in all three and will in all cases be a function of the distance form the center.
 
Thank you for answering, so for a Gaussian surface with radius < R the electric field will be zero since there are no charges in the hollow sphere?
 
886363 said:
Thank you for answering, so for a Gaussian surface with radius < R the electric field will be zero since there are no charges in the hollow sphere?

Yes indeed.

Now, what would be the E field between radii R and r?
 
E=ρ(Vr-VR)/3εr2?
 
No. Don't involve V. We have area and we have volumetric charge density.

What's the general formula relating the E field, the area of your Gaussian surface and the charge inside that surface?

Oh, and you'll need a new variable for radius since the E field will from now on be a function of the radial distance from the center. Your problem should not have assigned r as the radius of the sphere but too late I guess, so use d as your new variable.
 
Last edited:
I've used this since the total charge enclosed in the sphere with radius r is ρVr, which would give me the charge enclosed if there was no hollow sphere, hence why I am subtracting to account for the 'missing charge' due to the hollow sphere.

So E4πd2=Q/ε

I'm sorry for sounding stupid but Gauss' Law is something that just isn't clicking for me.
 
Gauss' law is beautifully simple. It just says that the the total electric flux thru a surface bounding a volume is equal to the charge inside that volume, divided by epsilon.

Flux is the vector dot-product of the electric field times each differential area, integrated over the entire surface. In your case that integral reduces to the area of the surface times the electric field which happens to be constant along the entire surface, due to symmetry.

So now how about we set up a Gaussian surface at a distance d from the center, with R < d < r?

Oh BTW your last formula is correct. What is Q(d)?
 
So for R<d<r

d=\sqrt{\dfrac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon E}}

and for d>r

r=\sqrt{\dfrac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon E}}
 
  • #10
886363 said:
So for R<d<r

d=\sqrt{\dfrac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon E}}

Yes, but solve for E. You had the right idea before: Q = charge inside the Gaussian surface at radius = d minus charge of hollow center.
and for d>r

r=\sqrt{\dfrac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon E}}

No. Why change from d to r? But keep in mind that the total charge Q does not increase for d > r.
 
  • #11
So just to check that we're agreeing on the labeling.

R is the radius of the hollow sphere
d is the radius of our Gaussian surface
r radius of the charged sphere


E_{d&lt;r}=\dfrac{Q_d}{4 \pi d^2 \epsilon}

E_{d&gt;r}=\dfrac{Q_r}{4 \pi d^2 \epsilon}

I really appreciate the help.
 
  • #12
886363 said:
So just to check that we're agreeing on the labeling.

R is the radius of the hollow sphere
d is the radius of our Gaussian surface
r radius of the charged sphere


E_{d&lt;r}=\dfrac{Q_d}{4 \pi d^2 \epsilon}

E_{d&gt;r}=\dfrac{Q_r}{4 \pi d^2 \epsilon}

I really appreciate the help.

Those are right.

But keep in mind that Qd is the charge inside d, so that formula really applies for all d, by definition.

Qr in your formula is the charge inside r but remember to subtract 4πR2ρ from 4πr2ρ .

Qd in your formula is charge inside d < r but again remember to subtract 4πR2ρ from 4πd2ρ .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
I'm really grateful for your help, thank you.

Have a nice day/night.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K