How to find the equation of a line in complex analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of a line in complex analysis, specifically using the formula Re[((m+i)z+b)]=0. The slope, m, is calculated as m = (Im[z1] - Im[z2]) / (Re[z1] - Re[z2]). The correct value for b is derived using the point-slope form, leading to the equation Re[((1/2+i)z - 1/2)]=0 for the points z1=1+0i and z2=-1-i. This method provides a clear geometric interpretation of lines in the complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation as z = x + iy
  • Familiarity with real analysis concepts, particularly the equation of a line
  • Knowledge of the geometric interpretation of distances in the complex plane
  • Basic skills in algebraic manipulation of complex equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of complex functions in the complex plane
  • Learn about the properties of complex numbers and their applications in analysis
  • Study the concept of distance and midpoints in complex analysis
  • Investigate the implications of the equation Re[((m+i)z+b)]=0 in various complex analysis contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of complex functions will benefit from this discussion.

Bacat
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
*This is not homework, though a class was the origin of my curiosity.

In real analysis we could find the equation of a line that passes through two points by finding the slope and then plugging in one set of points to calculate the value of b. ie

y = mx + b

m = \frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}

In complex analysis, we know that the equation for a line is Re[((m+i)z+b)]=0. Sitting down to derive m, I find the following:

m = \frac{Im[z_1] - Im[z_2]}{Re[z_1]-Re[z_2]}

But if I try to plug in the points (say z_{1} and z_{2}), it doesn't give me a value for b that makes sense. what is the correct way to find the equation of a line?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bacat said:
In complex analysis, we know that the equation for a line is Re[((m+i)z+b)].
The expression you gave is not an equation. What is the complete expression?
The complex plane is simply an imaginary axis and a real axis at right angles to each other. If z = (x, y) = x + iy is an arbitrary complex variable, it pretty much replaces y in our equations with Im[z] and x with Re[z]. so if you have a graph with points (x, y) that satisfy the equation y = mx + b, you will get the same graph in the complex plane with the equation Im[z] = m*Re[z] + b. This is not very geometric, however, and your equation for the slope of a line passing through the points z1 and z2 is more descriptive:
m = \frac{Im[z_1] - Im[z_2]}{Re[z_1]-Re[z_2]}

But if I try to plug in the points (say z_{1} and z_{2}), it doesn't give me a value for b that makes sense. what is the correct way to find the equation of a line?
I'm not sure what equation you're plugging it into but geometrically, a line can be defined as the set of points equidistant from two distinct points in the plane, say z1 and z2. This gives us the equation |z - z1| = |z - z2| for the set of points z on the line.
If you go ahead and translate this into the point-slope form, you get your m as above and the equation b = [[Re(z2)]22 + [Im(z2)]2 - ([Re(z1)]22 + [Im(z1)]2)]/2(Re(z2) - Re(z1)) = [|z2| - |z1|]/2(Re(z2) - Re(z1)) .
 
Yes, that makes sense now. I think I was just crunching wrong. I amended my previous equation. Re((m+i)z + b))=0

If I let z_1=1+0i and z_2=-1-i

I calculate:

m=\frac{0-(-1)}{1-(-1)}=\frac{1}{2}

Re((\frac{1}{2}+i)*(1+0i)+b))=0
Re(\frac{1}{2}+i+b)=0
b=-\frac{1}{2}

And the equation of the line is: Re((\frac{1}{2}+i)z - \frac{1}{2})=0

This works. Thank you!
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K