I How to find the generator of this Lie group?

Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
How to find the generator of this Lie group?
Hello, there. Consider a Lie group operating in a space with points ##X^\iota##. Its elements ##\gamma [ N^i]## are labeled by continuous parameters ##N^i##. Let the action of the group on the space be ##\gamma [N^i] X^\iota=\bar X^\iota (X^\kappa, N^i)##. Then the infinitesimal transformation is given by $$\gamma[\delta N^i]X^\iota=X^\iota+\left . \frac {\partial \bar X^\iota (X^\kappa, N^i)}{\partial N^i} \right |_{N^i=0}\delta N^i=X^\iota+\xi^\iota_i(X^\kappa) \delta N^i$$ in the neighborhood of the identity ##N^i=0##. According to the paper, the generators of the Lie group is ##X_i=\xi^\iota_i (X^\kappa) \frac \partial {\partial X^\iota}## I do not see how to get this conclusion. I thought the genrator should be ##\xi^\iota_i(X^\kappa) ## itself. Is it related to the fact that the genrator is a vector, and ##\frac \partial {\partial X^\iota}## is merely the basis vector as in the differential geometry?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
Summary:: How to find the generator of this Lie group?

Is it related to the fact that the generator is a vector, and ##\frac \partial {\partial X^\iota}## is merely the basis vector as in the differential geometry?
Yes. We have to have ##n## coordinates over all ##\iota##.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top