How to find the partition function of the 1D Ising model?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the partition function for the 1D Ising model, starting from the expression involving binomial coefficients and exponential terms. The initial derivation leads to the result Z = (2 cosh(βJ))^N, but there is confusion regarding the factor of 2 compared to the expected answer of Z = (cosh(βJ))^N. Participants are questioning whether the provided answer is incorrect or if additional steps are needed to reconcile the discrepancy. Clarification is sought on how to eliminate the factor of 2 from the final expression. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the derivation steps in statistical mechanics.
Dom Tesilbirth
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider a one-dimensional Ising model with ##N## spins at very low temperature. Let there be ##r## spin flips with each costing energy ##2J##. The total energy of the system is ##E=-NJ+2rJ## and the number of configurations is ##C(N, r)##, where ##r## varies from ##0## to ##N##. Find the partition function.
Relevant Equations
##E=-NJ+2rJ## and
##Z=\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-\beta \left[ -NJ+2rJ\right] }##
Attempt at a solution:

\begin{aligned}Z=\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-\beta \left[ -NJ+2rJ\right] }\\
\Rightarrow Z=e^{\beta NJ}\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-2\beta rJ}\end{aligned}

Let ##e^{-2\beta J}=x##. Then ##e^{-2\beta rJ}=x^{r}##.

\begin{aligned}\therefore Z=e^{\beta NJ}\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C(N, r)x^{r}\\
\Rightarrow Z=e^{\beta NJ}\left( 1+x\right) ^{N}=\left( e^{\beta J}+e^{\beta J}e^{-2\beta J}\right) ^{N}\\
\Rightarrow Z=\left( e^{\beta J}+e^{-\beta J}\right) ^{N}\\
\Rightarrow Z=\left( 2\cosh\beta J\right) ^{N}\end{aligned}

However, the answer provided is ##Z=\left(\cosh \beta J\right) ^{N}##. How do we remove the factor ##2##? Was the given answer wrong, or is there something that I still need to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dom Tesilbirth said:
How do we remove the factor ##2##? Was the given answer wrong, or is there something that I still need to do?
Factor 2 seems to be right.

ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ising_model
 
  • Like
Likes Dom Tesilbirth
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...