How to find the partition function of the 1D Ising model?

Dom Tesilbirth
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider a one-dimensional Ising model with ##N## spins at very low temperature. Let there be ##r## spin flips with each costing energy ##2J##. The total energy of the system is ##E=-NJ+2rJ## and the number of configurations is ##C(N, r)##, where ##r## varies from ##0## to ##N##. Find the partition function.
Relevant Equations
##E=-NJ+2rJ## and
##Z=\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-\beta \left[ -NJ+2rJ\right] }##
Attempt at a solution:

\begin{aligned}Z=\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-\beta \left[ -NJ+2rJ\right] }\\
\Rightarrow Z=e^{\beta NJ}\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C\left( N,r\right) e^{-2\beta rJ}\end{aligned}

Let ##e^{-2\beta J}=x##. Then ##e^{-2\beta rJ}=x^{r}##.

\begin{aligned}\therefore Z=e^{\beta NJ}\sum ^{N}_{r=0}C(N, r)x^{r}\\
\Rightarrow Z=e^{\beta NJ}\left( 1+x\right) ^{N}=\left( e^{\beta J}+e^{\beta J}e^{-2\beta J}\right) ^{N}\\
\Rightarrow Z=\left( e^{\beta J}+e^{-\beta J}\right) ^{N}\\
\Rightarrow Z=\left( 2\cosh\beta J\right) ^{N}\end{aligned}

However, the answer provided is ##Z=\left(\cosh \beta J\right) ^{N}##. How do we remove the factor ##2##? Was the given answer wrong, or is there something that I still need to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dom Tesilbirth said:
How do we remove the factor ##2##? Was the given answer wrong, or is there something that I still need to do?
Factor 2 seems to be right.

ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ising_model
 
  • Like
Likes Dom Tesilbirth
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top