How to FULLY understand a definition?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andytoh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of fully understanding mathematical definitions, particularly in the context of concepts like tensors and the fundamental theorem of calculus (FTC). Participants explore the nature of understanding in mathematics, questioning whether memorization and problem-solving equate to true comprehension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that despite years of study and problem-solving, they still feel they do not fully grasp certain mathematical concepts, such as tensors and the FTC.
  • One participant suggests that true understanding might come from the ability to explain a concept to someone else, though they humorously note personal limitations in this regard.
  • Another participant reflects on the disconnect between proving mathematical statements and genuinely understanding their implications, citing specific examples like the equivalence of the axiom of choice and related theorems.
  • A quote from Von Neumann is shared, emphasizing that in mathematics, understanding often comes from familiarity rather than deep comprehension.
  • Some participants discuss the FTC, with differing views on its abstraction and the intuitive grasp of its implications regarding area and derivatives.
  • One participant mentions the importance of historical context in understanding mathematical definitions and concepts, suggesting that time and familiarity can aid comprehension.
  • There is a discussion about the rigorousness of mathematical definitions and whether assumptions are often overlooked in teaching and learning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the difficulty of achieving full understanding of mathematical definitions, but multiple competing views remain regarding what constitutes true understanding and how it can be achieved. The discussion remains unresolved, with various perspectives on the nature of comprehension in mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the completeness of their understanding and highlight the potential for missing assumptions or deeper insights that are not explicitly stated in definitions or proofs.

  • #31
complexPHILOSOPHY said:
Jake: The band... the band...
Reverend Cleophus James: DO YOU SEE THE LIGHT?
Jake: THE BAND!
Reverend Cleophus James: DO YOU SEE THE LIGHT?
Elwood: What light?
Reverend Cleophus James: HAVE YOU SEEEEN THE LIGHT?
Jake: YES! YES! JESUS H. TAP-DANCING CHRIST... I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!

I MISS JOHN BELUSHI!

You are the homie, mathwonk!

say what?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K