How to get the matrices in partial trace

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the formula for the partial trace of a matrix L_{AB}, specifically the meaning of the variable 'd' and how to derive the initial 2x4 matrix from the given formula. Participants clarify that 'i' represents the identity matrix and 'id' refers to the zero matrix, emphasizing the use of tensor products and bra-ket notation. There is confusion regarding the computation of the first row of the matrix, with a request for more context on the example provided. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of matrix operations in quantum mechanics and the need for clearer explanations. Further insights into the origin of the example would be beneficial for better understanding.
munirah
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Good day,

I want to ask the matrix that obtained from below formula and example.

$$tr_A(L_{AB})=\sum_i [(\langle i|\otimes id)L_{AB}(|i\rangle\otimes id)]$$

this formula above can be represented as in matrix form below,

$$tr_A(L_{AB})= \left(\array{1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0}\right)\cdot \left(\array{0&0&1&0\\1&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0} \right)\cdot \left( \array{1&0\\0&1\\0&0\\0&0}\right)=\left(\array{0&0\\1&0} \right)$$

My question are:

1.what its mean by d in this formula? How can I get this d?

2.How he get the first 2X4 matrix? I already calculate but I just get first row only. How it compute from the formula exactly?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more information from where you took this example as it seems a little out of context.

From what I see the i stands for the identity matrix, and id for the 0 matrix, the O with the cross stands for tensor product, and take into account that < | and | > come from bra - ket notation of vectors and covectors.

This appears to be a formula for the trace of a matrix L_{AB} which I have no idea from where comes.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
855
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K