How to get there? (learning physics)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around self-directed learning in physics, particularly for someone studying Industrial Engineering with a keen interest in advancing their physics knowledge independently. Participants explore resources, study strategies, and the necessary mathematical background for various physics topics, including quantum mechanics and advanced electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with Leonard Susskind's videos and books as a manageable introduction to classical and quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant recommends a free online resource for self-studying calculus, emphasizing the importance of mastering calculus before diving into physics.
  • Some participants argue that a solid understanding of calculus and linear algebra is essential before tackling advanced physics topics, while others suggest that linear algebra can be learned concurrently with calculus.
  • Several participants propose specific textbooks for linear algebra and differential equations, highlighting different levels of rigor and applicability.
  • There is a contention regarding the necessity of rigorous texts for partial differential equations (PDEs) when studying advanced electromagnetism, with differing opinions on the level of mathematical rigor required.
  • One participant advises that while a rigorous understanding of PDEs may not be necessary for studying Jackson's electromagnetism, a good instructor is crucial for success in that material.
  • Another participant suggests a structured path through introductory physics texts, recommending specific volumes and authors for mechanics and electromagnetism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the prerequisites for studying advanced physics. While there is consensus on the importance of calculus, opinions diverge on the necessity of rigorous texts for linear algebra and PDEs, as well as the recommended resources for self-study.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various resources and textbooks, but there is no consensus on the best approach or specific materials, reflecting a range of personal experiences and preferences in learning physics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students in engineering or related fields who are interested in self-studying physics, as well as those seeking recommendations for resources and study strategies in advanced physics topics.

ege
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings folks!

I am studying Industrial Engineering and that's my freshman year, I have some questions :

Physics is kind of my hobby although my curriculum hasn't a lot to do with physics I would like to advance on my own.

As math skills are crucial I have to briefly introduce my condition,I am currently taking calculus course, next midterm I will be taking linear algebra and multivariable calculus and differential equations next year. However, I don't want to wait for them I'd like advance on self-pace.

->So what titles should I add to my arsenal for advanced physics? I know that might be an early question but I have to make a mindset for myself.

->Is it possible for one to advance in physics on his own? If yes is there any source you can advise or track should I follow?

->Quantum mechanics amazes me but as I am completely beginner I just skim the sources. How should I study for that field? What are the required skills for to study and understand the subject properly?

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get your feet wet, you could consider Leonard Susskinds videos online and his books on Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics,. The math is heavier than conceptual physics approaches but not as heavy as what you'd get in a undergrad course. He calls it the theoretical minimum.

http://theoreticalminimum.com/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest
This is good (and free)
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/self-study-calculus/
Teaches Calculus I, II, and III, which should be enough for most engineers, though complex calculus can also be of help, e^iwt is just magical.
You should also get acquainted with differential equations, sadly i don't have a book for that (the book i used is in Spanish, and isn't a translation)
I'd honestly wait on physics if you're not being taught so right now, getting all the tools before starting to use them is important, this opinion is not a popular one though.
Good luck
 
I would strongly agree with what jedishrfu suggests. I have already watched a lot of these lectures in various fields and if you try hard enough to follow, you'll definitely learn a lot and be prepared for more advanced stuff. Also, it's a great idea to dig the insights here in the forum and find many relevant posts. If you are really having the will to learn then impossible is nothing!
 
I would learn calculus 2 before attempting to learn linear algebra. Calculus is not really needed to learn linear algebra. However, Linear Algebra can be abstract and completing more math can help better understands different types of mathematics.

Do not use solutions manuals. They do not allow to exercise your brain properly. Give an honest attempt in solving the problems. If all else fails, post questions here.

You can try to read Anton: Elementary Linear Algebra. It is a mixture of theory and applied linear algebra. If it is too hard, try Paul Shields: Elementary Linear Algebra. Shields book stays in R^3. It offers great intuition. Very easy book, but a good book. If you understand Shields, then you may even skip Anton and go to a book of Friedberg's level right after.

After learning calculus 2, you can start learning Ordinary Differential Equations. There are two books I recommend, Ross: Ordinary Differential Equations and Zill: First Course in Ordinary Differential Equations. Any edition will do, find the cheapest.

Ross is very informative and Zill can be used as supplement and for problems. I found problems in Ross to be fairly easy, my only complaint of this book.
 
For "advanced" physics(graduate-level EM, QM...) calculus is a basic pre-requisite, if you want to study these subjects at this level you will going to need some more, First, study with a good and rigorous book in linear algebra, like Linear Algebra Done Wrong by Treil, Second study from a Mathematical Physics book for the enough base to understand the subjects(Fourier analysis, Complex Calculus, Variational Calculus and many other cool things) i like Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences
for a basic understanding, and after that you should study Ordinary Differential Equations with a rigorous book too, and so with Partial Differential Equations(if you want learn advanced EM with Jackson you WILL need a rigorous book on PDEs), and for more advanced fields there is a lot more pre-requisites...
 
Andreol263 said:
if you want learn advanced EM with Jackson you WILL need a rigorous book on PDEs

I don't agree. If you want to do Jackson, you will need to have a good knowledge of PDE, sure. But a mathematically rigorous book on PDE is unnecessary.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100
Andreol263 said:
For "advanced" physics(graduate-level EM, QM...) calculus is a basic pre-requisite, if you want to study these subjects at this level you will going to need some more, First, study with a good and rigorous book in linear algebra, like Linear Algebra Done Wrong by Treil, Second study from a Mathematical Physics book for the enough base to understand the subjects(Fourier analysis, Complex Calculus, Variational Calculus and many other cool things) i like Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences
for a basic understanding, and after that you should study Ordinary Differential Equations with a rigorous book too, and so with Partial Differential Equations(if you want learn advanced EM with Jackson you WILL need a rigorous book on PDEs), and for more advanced fields there is a lot more pre-requisites...
While I like Boa's book, it's probably not going to help you study graduate level physics. If you made it that far, you've probably already seen the majority of Boa's in physics classes. Byron and Fuller is better for that.

You also don't need rigorous treatment of PDE's for Jackson, the only thing that will help you with that book is a good instructor.

I also seriously doubt the OP is talking about Jackson/Goldstein/L&L/whatever, to be honest, anyway.

OP, continue your math. if you don't need to do the basic introductory physics sequence for your major pick up Physics by H&K 4th/5th edition. Go through volume 1 for mechanics. After that, you can either pick two paths -> go through volume 2 for E&M or go through K&K for a more rigorous treatment of mechanics. If you go the K&K route, pick up Purcell for E&M after you finish K&K.

Since you're doing this in addition to your degree, just going through volume 1 of physics will probably take anywhere from 6 months to a year. The path above is the starting point for most physics majors, and will keep you busy for a while. After that you can get some additional advice here if you decide to continue to study as a hobby. Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K