How to imagine a classical phase space for N particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the phase space for N classical particles is indeed a 6N-dimensional space, where each particle contributes three position and three momentum coordinates. The confusion arises from the interpretation of phase space; it is not a collection of individual particle states but rather a single point representing the entire system's state. Each point in this 6N-dimensional space corresponds to a unique configuration of all particles, rather than separate coordinates for each particle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and phase space concepts
  • Familiarity with the principles of momentum and position coordinates
  • Knowledge of multi-particle systems in physics
  • Basic grasp of dimensionality in mathematical spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of phase space in classical mechanics
  • Study the implications of 6N-dimensional spaces in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about Hamiltonian mechanics and its relation to phase space
  • Investigate the differences between phase space and configuration space
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, multi-particle systems, and phase space analysis.

Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Classically a single particle will have 3 position coordinates and 3 momentum coordinates, and so it "exists" in a 6-dimensional phase space and moves around this space in relation to time (known as the phase trajectory). However I've read that when we have N classical particles, their position/momentum coordinates represent a 6N-dimensional space.

Is this really a 6N-dimensional space? Or is it a 6 dimensional space (representing the possible momentum/position values possible) with N particles defined within that space each with their own trajectories around it?I guess what I mean, is it one of these two situations;

1) Consider two particles and ignore their momentum for now, only focusing on their x-coordinates of position. Defined by x_1 and x_2 for particles 1 and 2 respectively. Is the phase space here one-dimensional but defined for two particles? As in, do I simply have a co-ordinate axis "x" defined from minus infinity to infinity (a line) and x_1 and x_2 are placed on that coordinate axis appropriately? So if x_1 = 2, x_2 = 100, I place x_1 on 2 and x_2 on 100 on the "x" axis?or

2) The phase space is actually 2 dimensional and with "x_1" and "x_2" coordinate axes. Like an x-y plane. I place x_1 at (2,0) and x_2 at (0,100)? The value for x_1 can only move along the x_1 coordinate axis, and the value for x_2 can only move along the x_2 coordinate axis.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's 2).

1) is a possible representation of your system but not what is normally called phase space. In phase space every point corresponds to a state of the whole system, and each axis to a degree of freedom. In your example with two particles the system's state is (2,100). It's one point, not two or N.
 
Thanks, your post made me realize the phase space is related to the system, not the individual particles of a system themselves. Hence, as you said, a point in a 6N-dimensional phase space describes the state of a system, and consequently then describes the property of each individual particle in the system. We don't "place" each individual particle in the phase space and at a frozen moment in time observe the positions of each particle (as I assumed in example (1)), and let their individual positions in the phase space be a representation of the state of the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K