Simulation of pp-collision and Z boson production

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on simulating proton-proton collisions to produce a Z boson using Monte Carlo methods. Participants explore the momentum distribution of quarks from each proton, emphasizing the importance of Parton Density Functions (PDFs) in determining the momentum fractions x1 and x2. The conversation highlights the conditions necessary for Z boson production, particularly the constraints on energy and momentum, and the distinction between on-shell and off-shell production. It is noted that achieving the precise conditions for producing a Z boson at rest is rare in practice, as additional particles like jets are typically produced in collisions. The complexities of calculating cross-sections and the implications of varying quark momentum distributions are also discussed, indicating challenges in simulation accuracy.
  • #31
This isn't going to work. That procedure forces x2 to have a particular distribution, and that distribution may or may not (in fact, doesn't) match the correct x2 distribution.

What you need to do instead, if you want to go down this path, is once you have the x2, you calculate the probability of getting this x2, and then toss a random number. If the random number matches this probability, you keep the event, otherwise, you start over. This is called reweighting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Jan Eysermans said:
What do you mean by symmetry? When I compare the u-PDF generating x1 values with the antiu-PDFs, I notice a slightly difference (not a statistical one because the difference is "reproducible").
"quark from proton 1 + antiquark from proton 2" should give the same result as "antiquark from proton 1 + quark from proton 2". If it does not, there is something wrong.

From this, it is not correct to sample only from the u-PDFs I guess.
Sure, you have to account for all quarks. Just add their contributions afterwards?

I don't see how sampling the u-PDF covers processes like anti-s + s -> Z.


I agree with Vanadium in terms of reweighting.
 
  • #33
Indeed, including the distributions for x2 are needed.. I have implemented the method of Vanadium 50 and the results are more or less ok! Thanks everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K