Simulation of pp-collision and Z boson production

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the simulation of proton-proton collisions leading to Z boson production using Monte Carlo methods. Key concepts include the use of Parton Density Functions (PDFs) to determine quark momentum fractions (x1 and x2) and the conditions necessary for Z boson creation at rest. The participants clarify that while the center-of-mass energy must exceed the Z boson mass, the specific conditions for momentum fractions must also be satisfied to account for the energy required for the Z boson to be produced on-shell. The conversation highlights the complexities of modeling such collisions accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Monte Carlo simulation techniques
  • Familiarity with Parton Density Functions (PDFs)
  • Knowledge of four-momentum conservation in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of center-of-mass energy in high-energy collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implementation of Monte Carlo simulations for particle collisions
  • Learn about the calculation and application of Parton Density Functions (PDFs)
  • Explore the principles of four-momentum conservation in particle physics
  • Investigate the conditions for on-shell and off-shell particle production
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, computational physicists, and researchers involved in high-energy collision simulations, particularly those focusing on Z boson production and related phenomena.

  • #31
This isn't going to work. That procedure forces x2 to have a particular distribution, and that distribution may or may not (in fact, doesn't) match the correct x2 distribution.

What you need to do instead, if you want to go down this path, is once you have the x2, you calculate the probability of getting this x2, and then toss a random number. If the random number matches this probability, you keep the event, otherwise, you start over. This is called reweighting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Jan Eysermans said:
What do you mean by symmetry? When I compare the u-PDF generating x1 values with the antiu-PDFs, I notice a slightly difference (not a statistical one because the difference is "reproducible").
"quark from proton 1 + antiquark from proton 2" should give the same result as "antiquark from proton 1 + quark from proton 2". If it does not, there is something wrong.

From this, it is not correct to sample only from the u-PDFs I guess.
Sure, you have to account for all quarks. Just add their contributions afterwards?

I don't see how sampling the u-PDF covers processes like anti-s + s -> Z.


I agree with Vanadium in terms of reweighting.
 
  • #33
Indeed, including the distributions for x2 are needed.. I have implemented the method of Vanadium 50 and the results are more or less ok! Thanks everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K