How to Implement Current Conservation for SU(N) in the Adjoint Representation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a solution to implementing current conservation for SU(N) in the adjoint representation, starting with the equation D^{\mu}F_{\mu\nu} = - j_{\nu}. By differentiating this covariantly and anti-symmetrizing, it leads to the relation D^{\nu}j_{\nu} = \frac{1}{2}[D^{\mu}, D^{\nu}]F_{\mu\nu}. The covariant derivative in the adjoint representation is defined as D^{\mu}M = \partial^{\mu}M + [A^{\mu}, M], which allows for the derivation of [D^{\mu}, D^{\nu}]M = [F^{\mu\nu}, M]. Substituting M = F_{\mu\nu} into the previous equation results in D^{\nu}j_{\nu} = 0, confirming current conservation in this context. The implementation is effectively demonstrated in the adjoint representation.
Tian
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the "An introduction to Quantum Field Thoery" of Peskin and Schroeder, the equation(15.51) of the chapter 15.3 gives the classical equation of motion, so from this equation to derive the current conservation.
Relevant Equations
the classical equation of motion for SU(N), please see my picture
Here is my solution
2C869620FEBDBAA1F955AC83ADAF6638.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D^{\mu}F_{\mu\nu} = - j_{\nu}, Differentiate this covariantly and anti-symmetrized to obtain \frac{1}{2}[D^{\mu}, D^{\nu}]F_{\mu\nu} = D^{\nu}j_{\nu}. \ \ \ \ (1) Now, from the definition of the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (acting on any matrix-valued field) D^{\mu}M \equiv \partial^{\mu}M + [A^{\mu} , M], you can show that [D^{\mu} , D^{\nu}]M = [F^{\mu\nu} ,M] Thus, for M = F_{\mu\nu}, eq(1) becomes D^{\nu}j_{\nu} = \frac{1}{2}[F^{\mu\nu} , F_{\mu\nu}] = 0.
 
Thank you veery much . It should be done in the adjoint repesentation.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top