How to interpret Pascal's Triangle for negative numbers?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of Pascal's Triangle when extended to negative numbers. Participants explore whether the concept of 'sum of all possible paths' can be applied to this extended version and consider the implications of such interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a video by Sal that discusses interpreting members of Pascal's Triangle as the sum of all possible paths to reach that member.
  • There is a question about whether the same interpretation can be applied to the extended version of Pascal's Triangle for negative numbers.
  • One participant notes that the magnitudes of the numbers in the 'negative Pascal's triangle' are the same as those in the normal version and asks how the rearrangement and sign allocation work.
  • Another participant questions the physical significance of Pascal's Triangle, suggesting it may merely represent a recurrence relation without inherent physical meaning.
  • One participant expresses a belief that they may know the answers to the questions posed but does not elaborate further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical significance of Pascal's Triangle, with some suggesting it lacks physical meaning while others imply there may be significance worth exploring. The application of the 'sum of all possible paths' interpretation to the negative version remains an open question without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved the assumptions regarding the interpretation of negative numbers in Pascal's Triangle, nor have they clarified the mathematical steps involved in the rearrangement and sign allocation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in combinatorial mathematics, the properties of Pascal's Triangle, or the implications of extending mathematical concepts to negative integers may find this discussion relevant.

PLAGUE
Messages
37
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Intuition behind extended Pascal's Triangle.
This answer shows an extended version of Pascal's Triangle that works for negative numbers too.

In This video, Sal shows how to interpret the members of Pascal's Triangle as the sum of all the possible paths to get to that member.

Is there any way we can use this same 'sum of all the possible paths' to interpret This extended version of Pascal's Triangle?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
PLAGUE said:
In This video, Sal shows how to interpret the members of Pascal's Triangle as the sum of all the possible paths to get to that member.
I'm not going to watch a video, but the interpretation as the sum of all possible paths follows directly from the interpretation as the sum of two entries in the preceding row: think about it.

PLAGUE said:
Is there any way we can use this same 'sum of all the possible paths' to interpret This extended version of Pascal's Triangle?
Can you see that the magnitude of the numbers in the 'negative Pascal's triangle' are the same as those in the normal version? Can you work out how the rearrangement works? Can you work out how the signs are allocated?

Once you have done this the answer should be clear, not just to your question but to how any fact about the normal Pascal's triangle translates to the negative one.
 
I think I know the answers to your questions.

But is there any physical significance at all?
 
PLAGUE said:
But is there any physical significance at all?
IMHO Pascal's triangle has no 'physical significance', it is just a diagrammatic representation of a recurrence relation. It is interesting that the diagram displays more patterns than one might expect, but these result from the underlying recurrence relation not from the diagram.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K