How to interpret this Wave Equation (Derivation) Help ?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a wave equation derived from the superposition of two sound waves traveling in the same medium. The original poster explores the mathematical representation of the waves and seeks clarification on how to interpret the resulting equation in terms of amplitude and interference effects.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of the derived wave equation, particularly how the amplitude relates to the phase constant. Some participants question the conditions under which the amplitude is maximized or minimized based on the phase relationship between the waves.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of constructive and destructive interference, discussing how the phase constant affects the resultant amplitude. Some guidance has been provided regarding the conditions for maximum and minimum amplitudes, though multiple interpretations of the phase constant's impact are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the original poster's struggle with interpreting the physical meaning of equations and the relationships between wave properties, indicating a potential gap in foundational understanding that is being addressed through discussion.

Shahab Mirza
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi dear people , Hello
I waw studying super position of two Sound Waves , traveling in same medium with same frequency , same wavelength and same amplitude while differing in phase .
quick derivation :
Wave 1 displacement y1= A sin (kx-vt ) and wave 2 displacement y2= A sin (kx-vt-phase constant)
after adding y1+y2 and then using trigonometry I got Final equation :-

y= (2A cos phase constant / 2) sin (kx-vt - phase constant / 2 ) ok now my question is that how it is interpreted in my textbook ? it is written that this equation shows that . 1. It can bee seen that resultant wave function is hormonic and has same frequency and wavelength as individual waves . Amplitude is twice than individual wave of same wavelength .

I want to know that How people interpret these equations and develop relationship between them ? I am having difficulty in physics because I lack this ability to know what equation delivers , Thanks please help me out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shahab Mirza said:
Amplitude is twice than individual wave of same wavelength

Not always. It depends on the phase constant.

The value of cos(angle) should be 1 if the amplitude is to be 2A. If phase constant is 0,then cos0=1 and amplitude is 2A.
 
ash64449 said:
Not always. It depends on the phase constant.

The value of cos(angle) should be 1 if the amplitude is to be 2A. If phase constant is 0,then cos0=1 and amplitude is 2A.
Thanks for your reply Sir ,
Actually I used some of my efforts to understand this phenomenon on my intermediate level .
Below is what I understood .
2A (cos phase / 2) in this equation if phase is 0 then cos = 1 then amplitude is maximum means twice than individual original wave. and integral multiple of 0,2pi.3pi and so on and resulting in constructive interference.
And when if phase is pi or any odd multiple of pi ,then cos angle value = 0 and there will be minimum amplitude resulting in destructive interference.

My conclusions are :-
1: If interference is Constructive then amplitude of 1st 2nd and s one overtones/hormonics forms larger dislplacments than original individual wavelength , means if 3 waves are traveling in phase means one after other than will make 3 times larger amplitude.
2: If interference is destructive than waves will be out of phase and crest of one will fall on trough of other and there amplitudes will be equal on both sides hence cancelling each others displacement at each point .and resultant wave will have zero amplitude .
 
Your conclusions are correct.
 
ash64449 said:
Your conclusions are correct.
Thats good , Thanks a lot Sir
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K