How to know if this irrational function has no asymptotes?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function F(x) = x + 1 - 3√((x - 1)/(ax + 1)) and the conditions under which it has no asymptotes, particularly focusing on the parameter 'a'. Participants explore the implications of different values of 'a' on the existence of vertical and oblique asymptotes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effects of 'a' being greater than, less than, or equal to zero on the asymptotic behavior of the function. There are attempts to identify specific values of 'a' that would result in no asymptotes, with some questioning the clarity of the original poster's statements regarding oblique asymptotes.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining various interpretations of asymptotic behavior. Some have offered insights into the implications of specific values of 'a', while others express confusion about the original poster's terminology and intent.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the definitions of asymptotes being referenced, particularly the distinction between vertical and oblique asymptotes. The discussion also highlights the dependency of the function's domain on the value of 'a'.

Jeanclaud
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
F(x)=x+1-3sqrt((x-1)/(ax+1))
For which value of a ,(c) has no asymptote?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know if a>0 then (c) will have 2 asymptote
And if a<o then (c) will have 1 vertical asymptote.
But I can't find any value of a so that (c) has no asymptote. Please give me some hints thank you.

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is leftover after you have eliminated a>0 and a<0? There is only one value possible.
 
RUber said:
What is leftover after you have eliminated a>0 and a<0? There is only one value possible.
a=0? But still it has an O.A.
 
I don't see what you are saying? Your denominator would be (0x+1) = 1.
 
I see now...you meant Oblique Asymptote.
I don't think this would have one.
By scale, yes -- the trend is in the direction of y = x as x gets large, but you can't argue that the function value gets closer to the line in the limit.
 
Jeanclaud said:
a=0? But still it has an O.A.
If a = 1, the part inside the radical approaches 1 for large values of |x|. That will give you an oblique asymptote.
RUber said:
I don't see what you are saying? Your denominator would be (0x+1) = 1.
The OP hasn't been very clear, but I think the asymptotes he's referring to are one that's oblique and one that's vertical.
 
RUber said:
I see now...you meant Oblique Asymptote.
I don't think this would have one.
By scale, yes -- the trend is in the direction of y = x as x gets large, but you can't argue that the function value gets closer to the line in the limit.
Then it will have only an asymptotic direction (parabolic branch). Thank you.
 
Jeanclaud said:
Then it will have only an asymptotic direction (parabolic branch). Thank you.
Determine the domain of this function. That, of course, depends upon the value of a .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K