How to list arXiv papers on NSF final report

Click For Summary
When filling out the "publications and products" section of the NSF final report, the appropriate category for arXiv articles is debated. The options include journal publications, books, internet dissemination, and other specific products. Listing arXiv articles under "internet dissemination" is suggested, despite concerns that it may not fit since arXiv is not a personal domain. The NSF advises separating multiple arXiv posts with semicolons and providing a single description for all, which raises questions about how to effectively summarize the content. Two approaches for the description are proposed: presenting a general idea that encompasses all papers or creating distinct sections for each paper. Clarification from NSF is recommended if there is uncertainty about the reporting process.
causalset
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I had NSF fellowship for the period of 2009 -- 2011, and now I have to fill out final report. When I am trying to fill out the section "publications and products" of my NSF report, it gives me four options:

a) Journal publications
b) Books
c) Internet dissemination
d) Other specific product

My question is which of these should I list my arXiv articles under? Should I list it under "c" (internet dissemination)? I am not sure whehter this is entirely appropriate since that section asks me for internet websites, but when I make arXiv post it is not my own domain; the domain is still arXiv.org On the other hand, if I list it under "journals" it doesn't seem appropriate either since arXiv is not really a journal. Finally, "other specific product" seems to be asking me about practical products people can use which again feels like it is inappropriate since my papers are not really "products".

I tried to list it under "Internet dissemination", but then I encountered another problem while doing so. Namely, it asks me for ONE website, but I have several arXiv posts. When I called NSF and asked them this question, they told me to separate them by semicolons. But then I asked them how about description below: what can I do to make separate description for each of the arXiv posts? Their answer was that there is nothing that can be done about it: it has to be one description for all of them. This makes me wonder again whether perhaps it was not appropriate section to list arZXiv under.

Anyway, let me give you a description of how I go there:

1. Log in under PI/co-PI management (I am considered to be my own PI)

2. Go to "Award and reporting functions"

3. Go to "Project reports system"

4. Click on the award number that they list

5. Click on "create/edit"

6. Click "continue"

7. Click on "publications and products"

8. There you will see the options a-d I talked about above

Anyway please let me know what is best to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.

I mean wahat they told me to do was to list all of my arXiv papers with semicolons and write ONE summary for all of them. My question is this: should I

A. Present a general idea and mention these different arXiv papers in context of this general idea

or

B. Have few different "chapters" of my essay, one per each arXiv?
 
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. If you don't understand it, ask them for clarification, and then do it.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K