MHB How to move a fraction to the bottom of a fraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatelove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
hatelove
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
Say I have:

\frac{x \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{y}

How can I make it look like:

\frac{x}{y \cdot \frac{1}{z}}

I'm trying to figure out the algebraic rule(s) for this
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daigo said:
Say I have:

\frac{x \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{y}

How can I make it look like:

\frac{x}{y \cdot \frac{1}{z}}

I'm trying to figure out the algebraic rule(s) for this
Well, you can't make it look exactly like that- they are not the same values, as you can see by putting in some values: if x, y, and z are all equal to 2, for example, the first fraction would have value \frac{2\frac{1}{2}}{2}= \frac{1}{2} while the second would be \frac{2}{2\frac{1}{2}}= 2.

What you can say is that multiplying in the numerator of a fraction is the same as multiplying the entire fraction:
\frac{x\frac{1}{z}}{y}= \frac{x}{y}\frac{1}{z}= \frac{x}{yz}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
145
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top