How to Normalize the Wave Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around normalizing the wave function \(\psi(x) = \frac{1}{1+ix}\). Participants explore the mathematical implications of the normalization condition and the evaluation of the integral involved in the normalization process.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the evaluation of the integral \(\langle\psi|\psi\rangle\) and question the assumptions regarding the integrand's properties, particularly whether it is odd or even. There are considerations about the choice of the branch for the arctangent function and its implications for the normalization constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored regarding the normalization constant and the evaluation of the integral. Some participants suggest that any branch of the arctangent can be used, while others express uncertainty about the significance of the normalization constant in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the importance of the normalization constant and the implications of choosing different branches of the arctangent function in the context of wave function normalization.

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Normalize the wave function ,\psi(x), where \psi(x)=\frac{1}{1+ix}.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


\langle\psi\mid\psi\rangle= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1-ix}{1+x^2}\frac{1+ix}{1+x^2}dx=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{1+x^2}=\left. arctan(x)\right|_{-\infty}^{\infty}=0 since arctan(x) is an odd function.
Now I know a normalized wavefunction satisfies \langle\psi\mid\psi\rangle=1.
I don't know how to manipulate the given wavefunction in order to satisfy the condition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is, only when the integrand is odd, you can say the symmetric integral is zero. But in your case, the integrand is even!
Here's how it should be:
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+x^2}dx=2 \int_{0}^\infty \frac{1}{1+x^2}dx=2 \tan^{-1}(x) |_0^\infty=(2k+1)\pi<br />
I should say I don't know what k to choose or even its important what k to choose or not!
 
The integrand is continuous and so must the primitive function be. Use this to fix k.
 
Well, this is what I think about k.
When people want to define \tan^{-1}(x), they restrict the domain of \tan(x) to (-\frac \pi 2,\frac \pi 2) to make it one-to-one. So the range of \tan^{-1}(x) is (-\frac \pi 2,\frac \pi 2) and so \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \tan^{-1}(x)=\frac \pi 2.
Also it seems to me that the normalization constant doesn't have that much physical significant!
 
In this particular problem, it is fine to pick any branch of arctan as any branch is a primitive function to the integrand (I could add an arbitrary constant on top to boot!). The only important thing is that you evaluate both limits of the integral in the same branch.

The normalisation constant will be important when you start evaluating expectation values, unless you want to write
$$
\langle x\rangle = \frac{\langle \psi| x |\psi\rangle}{\langle \psi |\psi\rangle}
$$
everywhere ... Better to just have computed ##\langle \psi |\psi\rangle## once and for all.
 
Orodruin said:
In this particular problem, it is fine to pick any branch of arctan as any branch is a primitive function to the integrand (I could add an arbitrary constant on top to boot!). The only important thing is that you evaluate both limits of the integral in the same branch.
Yeah, that's the right way of looking at it. I missed this in my first post. Considering this, \tan^{-1}(x)|_0^\infty is equal to \frac \pi 2 anyway!

Orodruin said:
The normalisation constant will be important when you start evaluating expectation values, unless you want to write
⟨x⟩=⟨ψ|x|ψ⟩⟨ψ|ψ⟩

everywhere ... Better to just have computed ⟨ψ|ψ⟩ once and for all.
But if we choose |\phi\rangle=\frac{|\psi\rangle}{\sqrt{\langle \psi|\psi\rangle}} to be our wave function, then the normalization constant is not important.
 
Last edited:
Well, then you have just normalised it using the normalisation constant ##1/\sqrt{\langle \psi|\psi\rangle}## ... This is the entire point of computing the normalisation constant.
 
Orodruin said:
Well, then you have just normalised it using the normalisation constant ##1/\sqrt{\langle \psi|\psi\rangle}## ... This is the entire point of computing the normalisation constant.
Yeah, I know what you mean. But I was saying that if it happens that the normalization integral can give multiple values, as I wrongly thought is the case here, then its not important which one to choose.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K