How to obtain amplitude of current in parallel RLC circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rlc circuit
AI Thread Summary
To find the amplitude of current in a parallel RLC circuit, KVL is applied to derive expressions for the currents through the resistor (I_R), inductor (I_L), and capacitor (I_C). The total current I is expressed as a combination of these individual currents, leading to the formula I(t) = V_0(1/R)sin(ωt) + V_0(ωC - 1/ωL)cos(ωt). The amplitude A of the current can be calculated using the formula A = √[(1/R)² + (ωC - 1/ωL)²]. This analytical method provides an alternative to phasor diagrams for determining current amplitude in AC circuits. The discussion emphasizes the equivalence of results obtained through both algebraic and vector approaches.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Consider the circuit below which is an RLC circuit with the circuit elements in parallel.
Relevant Equations
I would like to find the amplitude of the current ##I##.
1715547774429.png


If we apply KVL to the three separate loops involving the AC voltage we obtain expressions for ##I_R, I_L##, and ##I_C##.

$$-V(t)+I_R(t)R=0$$

$$\implies I_R(t)=\frac{V_0}{R}\sin{(\omega t)}$$

$$-V(t)=-L\dot{I}_L(t)$$

$$\implies I_L(t)=\frac{V_0}{\omega L}\sin{(\omega t-\pi/2)}$$

$$-V(t)+\frac{q(t)}{C}=0$$

$$\implies I_C(t)=V_0C\omega\sin{(\omega t+\pi/2)}$$

By KCL we have

$$I=I_R+I_L+I_C=\frac{V_0}{R}\sin{(\omega t)}+\frac{V_0}{\omega L}\sin{(\omega t-\pi/2)}+V_0\omega C\sin{(\omega t+\pi/2)}$$

How do we find the amplitude of ##I##?

In the notes I am following, they use phasor diagrams. I would like to know how to obtain the amplitude using analytical methods.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Finding the amplitude of ##I## is actually simple.

$$I(t)=V_0\left ( \frac{1}{R}\sin{(\omega t)}+\cos{(\omega t)}\left (\omega C-\frac{1}{\omega L}\right )\right )$$

where I have used the fact that

$$\sin{(\omega t-\pi/2)}=-\cos{(\omega t)}$$

$$\sin{(\omega t+\pi/2)}=\cos{(\omega t)}$$

Thus, we have an expression of the form ##a\sin{\omega t}+b\cos{\omega t}##.

If we set

$$a=A\sin{\phi}$$

$$b=A\cos{\phi}$$

then

$$A=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$

Thus, we can write

$$I(t)=a\sin{\omega t}+b\cos{\omega t}=A\sin{\phi}\sin{\omega t}+A\cos{\phi}\cos{\omega t}$$

$$=A\cos{(\omega t+\phi)}$$

where

$$A=\sqrt{\frac{1}{R^2}+\left (\omega C-\frac{1}{\omega L}\right )^2}$$

which is the amplitude of the current.

1715551971882.png
 
Last edited:
For the record, perhaps one might ask why I am not embracing phasor diagrams currently.

I guess it is because I don't have a solid grounding in using them.

For the example in the OP we have

1715551891910.png


It seems that the vectors are

$$\vec{I}_R=\frac{V_0}{R}\langle \cos{\omega t},\sin{\omega t}\rangle$$

$$\vec{I}_L=\frac{V_0}{\omega L}\langle \cos{(\omega t-\pi/2)},\sin{(\omega t-\pi/2)}\rangle$$

$$\vec{I}_C=V_0\omega C\langle \cos{(\omega t+\pi/2)},\sin{(\omega t+\pi/2)}\rangle$$

Apparently, we can add these vectors to get the vector for the current ##I##.

The diagram above seems to be the situation at times ##t=2\pi k## for integer ##k##.

The vectors are thus

$$\vec{I}_R=\langle V_0/R,0\rangle$$

$$\vec{I}_L=\langle 0,-V_0/\omega L\rangle$$

$$\vec{I}_C=\langle 0,V_0\omega C\rangle$$

and thus

$$\vec{I}_C+\vec{I}_L=\langle 0,V_0(C\omega+1/\omega L\rangle$$

which is the little pink vector in the picture above.

The black vector is the sum of all three phasors and is

$$\vec{I}=\langle V_0/R, V_0(C\omega+1/\omega L$$

The angle ##\phi## is the phase of the current and

$$\tan{\phi}=\frac{c\omega-1/\omega L}{1/R}$$

These are the same results we found algebraically.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top