How to prepare for Theoretical Physics MSci over a gap year?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to effectively prepare for an undergraduate MSci degree in Physics/Theoretical Physics during a gap year. Participants explore various strategies for enhancing problem-solving skills, familiarizing themselves with relevant topics, and improving mathematical proficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests working through STEP papers and Olympiad papers to improve problem-solving skills.
  • Another participant recommends familiarizing oneself with the first-year syllabus, including various mathematics and physics topics, and learning programming languages like LaTeX, Mathematica, and C++.
  • There are multiple recommendations for calculus textbooks, with some participants advocating for Spivak's Calculus while others criticize its suitability for those already familiar with calculus.
  • Some participants express a preference for Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right, while others suggest Friedberg's text as a more standard option.
  • Concerns are raised about the definition of "advanced calculus," with participants noting potential differences in interpretation, particularly between North American and other contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the suitability of various textbooks and preparation strategies, indicating that no consensus exists on the best approach or materials for preparation.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various textbooks and their appropriateness based on prior knowledge, but there is no resolution on which specific texts are definitively better for advanced study.

KingCrimson
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
So I will be starting an undergraduate MSci degree in Physics/Theoretical Physics in 2017, for the time being I am on a gap year. What's the best way to mentally prepare for a theoretical physics degree? I am not just talking about being familiar with the topics discussed, but also improving my problem solving skills as much as I can.
I will be doing the STEP papers (extra hard maths papers in the UK), which are quite challenging from what I have heard. I will also work through all the mathematics/physics Olympiad papers. I will go through all the Maths modules I did not do in my A-Levels. I am also learning Python.
Any tips? Any challenging books to read that could improve my problem solving skills?Any skills that you think might be useful?
Thanks in advance.

Note that I am aiming for getting at least a first (70%) over the 4 years at one of the toughest universities in the UK in terms of examinations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help, guys?
 
At a base level, learn about and then try to do the first year syllabus, the homeworks and the end-of-term exams from previous years from the course websites, learn LaTeX, mathematica, c++ programming. Beyond this, for starters, do your best to learn things like calculus (Thomas/Stewart), multivariable calculus (Thomas/Stewart), vector analysis (Schey), linear algebra (Anton), discrete math (no idea), elementary differential equations (Tennenbaum), elementary real analysis (Mendelson), elementary topology (Munkres), elementary manifold theory (Shifrin), intro calculus-based physics (Halliday-Resnick), Newtonian mechanics (Kleppner), elementary electromagnetism (Purcell), elementary special relativity (intro GR book early chapters, e.g. Ryder), elementary calculus of variations (some equations of math physics book), elementary tensor analysis (intro GR book early chapters) and (very slowly) prep for 2nd year subjects, youtube lectures for every topic online, e.g. Shifrin https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp9W-et2Zbx7u5_VMiXGtPQ treat olympiad stuff as extra-curricular, step (from vague/bad recollection) is a bunch of hard problems from those calculus books and some linear algebra and discrete math and stats.
 
bolbteppa said:
At a base level, learn about and then try to do the first year syllabus, the homeworks and the end-of-term exams from previous years from the course websites, learn LaTeX, mathematica, c++ programming. Beyond this, for starters, do your best to learn things like calculus (Thomas/Stewart), multivariable calculus (Thomas/Stewart), vector analysis (Schey), linear algebra (Anton), discrete math (no idea), elementary differential equations (Tennenbaum), elementary real analysis (Mendelson), elementary topology (Munkres), elementary manifold theory (Shifrin), intro calculus-based physics (Halliday-Resnick), Newtonian mechanics (Kleppner), elementary electromagnetism (Purcell), elementary special relativity (intro GR book early chapters, e.g. Ryder), elementary calculus of variations (some equations of math physics book), elementary tensor analysis (intro GR book early chapters) and (very slowly) prep for 2nd year subjects, youtube lectures for every topic online, e.g. Shifrin https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp9W-et2Zbx7u5_VMiXGtPQ treat olympiad stuff as extra-curricular, step (from vague/bad recollection) is a bunch of hard problems from those calculus books and some linear algebra and discrete math and stats.
What do you think of reading Spivak's Calculus? I have already done A-level maths and further maths so I have studied a lot of calculus (not much real analysis though).
 
Treat Spivak as elementary real analysis, do all/most-of the problems and proofs from the big bumper Thomas/Stewart calculus books, especially the later multivariable calculus chapters, will extremely help.
 
bolbteppa said:
Treat Spivak as elementary real analysis, do all/most-of the problems and proofs from the big bumper Thomas/Stewart calculus books, especially the later multivariable calculus chapters, will extremely help.
I will read them both. I have been recommended reading Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right, what do you think? Is it better than Anton's? I am looking for the more theoretical option.
 
Yeah Axler is great, probably the best on the material it does, but if you want 70%+ I'd say do all the Anton theory/problems as well.
 
Spivaks calculus book is stupid to use if you already known calculus, use a proper advanced calculus textbook or elementary analysis book.

Axlers book is Ok, I own it but honestly I prefer Friedberg as it provides information in a more standard fashion.
 
Crek said:
Spivaks calculus book is stupid to use if you already known calculus, use a proper advanced calculus textbook or elementary analysis book.

Axlers book is Ok, I own it but honestly I prefer Friedberg as it provides information in a more standard fashion.

Uuh, what advanced calculus book would be better than Spivak?
 
  • #10
micromass said:
Uuh, what advanced calculus book would be better than Spivak?

Which book by Spivak, "Calculus" or "Calculus on Manifolds"?
 
  • #11
The thread has been talking about Spivak's calculus.
 
  • #12
micromass said:
The thread has been talking about Spivak's calculus.

Okay. The reason I asked is because Crek wrote

Crek said:
if you already known calculus, use a proper advanced calculus textbook or elementary analysis book.

and, in North America, "advanced calculus" often means mutivarible/vector calculus (e.g. the book "Advanced Calculus" by Taylor and Mann that was used as the text for a course that I took), but Crek could have meant something different than this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: micromass

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
819
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K