How to proceed for grad school in physics after an awful undergrad performance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the challenges faced by a participant who has experienced poor performance in their undergraduate physics program and is now preparing to enter graduate school. The conversation explores concerns about exam phobia, study strategies, and the balance between thorough understanding of material versus course requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses doubt about their abilities due to past performance and questions whether to reassess their potential or remain positive about pursuing physics.
  • Another participant emphasizes that acceptance into graduate school indicates potential beyond exam scores and encourages the original poster to pursue their dream despite past challenges.
  • A participant notes the importance of overcoming exam phobia, especially since graduate programs often require passing qualifying exams.
  • The original poster describes their unique exam system, which lacks continuous assessment, leading to difficulties in self-evaluation and preparation.
  • The original poster raises concerns about their reading habits, stating that they struggle to cover material effectively and often switch between textbooks without mastering content.
  • Questions are posed regarding the best approach to studying advanced topics, such as whether to focus on a single core text or adhere strictly to course content, highlighting the tension between depth of understanding and breadth of coverage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on how to approach the challenges of graduate school, with some emphasizing the importance of perseverance and others focusing on practical study strategies. No consensus is reached regarding the best methods for studying or overcoming exam-related anxiety.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects the limitations of the original poster's current educational structure, which does not provide regular assessments, potentially impacting their ability to gauge understanding and progress.

su10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have just finished my undergrad in physics with dismal scores. i really wanted to study physics. i found it exciting and still do. but exams are a real hardle for me. i just have a phobia for them. now i am entering my grad school and for the first time after starting physics i am doubting my abilities. should i take my undergrad performance seriously to reassess myself or should i still be positive about pursuing physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgetting for now the past, how are you doing now in your current classes?
Most graduate programs have qualifying exams that you need to pass. So, you need to overcome your phobia of them.
 
well your school has accepted you for graduate entry. if they don't know, who does?
methinks there is a lot more to potential than what can be measured in a 2 - 3 hour exam. you passed, so that means.. you have passed the requirements to be awarded that degree - a great accomplishment!

i would say that you only live once and it is likely you would spend a long time asking "what-if" should you give up on your dream now.

and i would think there is a lot more to being a successful researcher than getting good grades. just follow your dream and keep working hard!
 
robphy said:
Forgetting for now the past, how are you doing now in your current classes?
Most graduate programs have qualifying exams that you need to pass. So, you need to overcome your phobia of them.

well, my grad school hasn't started yet. actually the exam system is a bit different here. we have one annual exam on all the courses. before that we just have lecture classes. there are no quizes, tutorials or assignments. so there is no way to assess yourself throughout the year.

beside exams one another obstacle that i found was in reading textbooks. i try to read each and every line of a text, trying to work out all the mathematical details. but after few weeks i see that i haven't gone far. this puts me off and i jump to another book trying to read it in the same manner. this has gone along all through my undergrad years. now i find myself not covering many important topics. what should be the correct approach in reading a text? what should be the approach in finishing a course even? say for example i am doing senior level Quantum Mechanics. should i target one core text (say sakurai) and try to go through it thoroughly within a year or should i stick to my course content? is it really possible to go through all the details of a text like sakurai? what i have found in this level is that there is too much topic to cover and too little time to grasp them all equally. so either you take a very proffessional approach and cover all the topics according to your course contents ignoring those aspects which you didn't have time to understand well or try to understand everything sacrificing your time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K