How to prove a set is a bounded set?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set S1 = {x ∈ R² : x1 ≥ 0, x2 ≥ 0, x1 + x2 = 2} is proven to be a bounded set. The proof demonstrates that for all (x1, x2) in S1, the inequality sqrt(x1² + x2²) < M holds true for M = 3. The maximum values of x1 and x2 are both constrained between 0 and 2, confirming that the set is bounded. The discussion emphasizes that the boundedness can be established without explicitly calculating the square root, as the constraints on x1 and x2 suffice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded sets in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of norms, specifically Euclidean norm
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities and their applications
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of bounded sets in metric spaces
  • Learn about the equivalence of different definitions of boundedness in real analysis
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of bounded sets in R²
  • Investigate the implications of boundedness on continuity and compactness
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on real analysis, geometry, and optimization. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of bounded sets and their properties.

Cyn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. I have to show that
S1 = {x ∈ R2 : x1 ≥ 0,x2 ≥ 0,x1 + x2 = 2}
is a bounded set.
2. So I have to show that sqrt(x1^2+x2^2)<M for all (x1,x2) in S1.3. I have said that M>0 and we have 0<=x1<=2 and 0<=x2<=2.
And x2 = 2-x1
We can fill in sqrt(x1^2 + (2-x1)^2) = sqrt (0^2 + (2-0)^2) = 2 < M = 3.
And we can fill in sqrt (x1^2 + (2-x1)^2) = sqrt (2^2 + (2-2)^2) = 2 < M = 3.
Every value between the 0 and the 2 that satisfy x1+x2 = 2 is smaller than this M. So the set is bounded.
Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cyn said:
Every value between the 0 and the 2 that satisfy x1+x2 = 2 is smaller than this M.
Can you prove this?

The approach works, although I would make it easier: Just use 0<=x1<=2 and 0<=x2<=2 to find a maximal value the square root can get, and use that as limit. You don't have to find the smallest possible M.
 
Cyn said:
1. I have to show that
S1 = {x ∈ R2 : x1 ≥ 0,x2 ≥ 0,x1 + x2 = 2}
is a bounded set.
2. So I have to show that sqrt(x1^2+x2^2)<M for all (x1,x2) in S1.3. I have said that M>0 and we have 0<=x1<=2 and 0<=x2<=2.
And x2 = 2-x1
We can fill in sqrt(x1^2 + (2-x1)^2) = sqrt (0^2 + (2-0)^2) = 2 < M = 3.
And we can fill in sqrt (x1^2 + (2-x1)^2) = sqrt (2^2 + (2-2)^2) = 2 < M = 3.
Every value between the 0 and the 2 that satisfy x1+x2 = 2 is smaller than this M. So the set is bounded.
Is this correct?

Bounded usually means that ##L_1 \leq x_1 \leq U_1## and ##l_2 \leq x_2 \leq U_2## for some finite ##L_1,L_2,U_1,U_2## with ##U_i \geq L_i## for all ##i##. Looking at ##\sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2}## is not necessary (but is harmless); one version of "bounded" is true if and only if the other is true as well. That is, the two versions are equivalent.

In your case you have ##0 \leq x_i \leq 2## for ##i = 1,2##, and that is all you need. You can always enclose the square with vertices (0,0), (),2), (2,0), (2,2) inside a larger circle if you want to, and that will bound the norm ##\sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K