Is Set S Open in R3? A Proof by Using Open Discs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of whether the set S = {x from R3 : x1 < 1 v x1 > 3 v x2 < 0 v x3 > -1} is open in R3. The user attempts to demonstrate that the subset S = {(x1, x2, x3) : x1 < 1} is open by using the concept of open discs and the inequality |x - x1| < 1 - x1. However, the response emphasizes the need for clarity and thoroughness in the proof, highlighting that the proof must include definitions and explanations of the terms used to effectively communicate the argument.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open sets in topology
  • Familiarity with the concept of open discs in R3
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their manipulation
  • Basic proof-writing skills in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of open sets in topology
  • Learn about the construction and significance of open balls in metric spaces
  • Explore examples of proofs involving inequalities in multivariable calculus
  • Review techniques for writing clear and structured mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying topology and analysis, as well as educators looking to improve their proof-writing skills.

Cyn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a set I = {x from R3 : x1<1 v x1>3 v x2<0 x x3>-1}

Homework Equations


Open disc
B (x,r)
(sqrt (x-x0)^2 + (y-y0)^2) < r

The Attempt at a Solution


I have done, for example by x1<1, that let r = 1-x1
Then sqrt ((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2) < sqrt (x-x1)^2) < r = 1-x1
So |x-x1| < 1-x1

x1-1<x-x1<1-x1
2x1 -1 < x < 1

So x<1 satisfy the inequality, so it is open. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have the right general idea, which is to show that the set S={(x1,x2,x3) : x1<1} is open because, any point (x1,x2,x3) in S is contained in the open ball centred on that point with radius (1-x1).

But you have not shown that. All you've done is write a few equations, with no explanations of their relevance, or how they relate to one another, and most of the terms undefined. A proof must tell a story, with a beginning, a middle and an end. And just like how in a novel, the characters must be introduced to the reader, the symbols you use must be explained (defined).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K