I How to prove that a scalar potential exists if the curl of the vector point function is zero?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter immortalsameer13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector calculus
immortalsameer13
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
scalar potential can be obtained by integrating the vector point function whose curl is zero but how to arrive at this result that a potential exist
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First show that if ##\mathrm{rot}\, v=0## then ##\int_Cv_xdx+v_ydy+v_zdz=0## for any closed curve ##C##. To do that
consider a 2-dimensional surface ##S## such that ##\partial S=C##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and topsquark
immortalsameer13 said:
scalar potential can be obtained by integrating the vector point function whose curl is zero but how to arrive at this result that a potential exist
Because the closed curve integral is zero, the one-way integral from one point to another has only one answer no matter which path is taken. So the one-way integral gives you a well-defined definition of the potential.

ADDED: Establish a starting point, ##p_0##, for the beginning of a path to any and all other points. The integral values from ##p_0## to the other points gives a well-defined potential at those points.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes immortalsameer13
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top