Programs How to pursue a physics grad program with a math degree?

AI Thread Summary
A person with a BS in mathematics is exploring options to transition into a physics graduate program. They are uncertain about the feasibility of directly entering such a program and whether pursuing an MS in applied math first would be beneficial. The discussion highlights that some universities, like North Carolina State University, do accept applicants with math backgrounds, but it’s crucial to demonstrate relevant coursework to convince admissions committees. The conversation also emphasizes that securing a graduate position may be easier than obtaining a job in the field, as employers often seek candidates with direct experience. Alternatives such as geodesy, which leverages mathematical skills in a practical context, are suggested as viable career paths. The importance of clarifying specific interests in experimental work versus theoretical physics is also noted, as hands-on experience can significantly influence career satisfaction.
ricky33
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hello, I hold a BS in mathematics and want to pursue a career in physics. Is there any way where I can directly join a physics grad program from my current background? What are the options available? And would it be better to pursue an MS in applied math and then switch to physics? Would a good grade on a GRE physics test make that happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanadium 50 said:
Why do you think the advice will be different than what you got lat week?
Couldn't find a program that accepts people from a math background, so I'm checking if it is possible and how could this be done. Another part that I didn't mention in my last question is: what's better, to get an MS in applied math or make the switch to physics from where I'm at right now.
 
I do not know how you could not find a program that accepts people from a math background. I just picked a university at random: e.g. see North Carolina State University, Physics Graduate admissions. NCSU clearly states they have considered applicants with electrical engineering and mathematics degrees as well as physics. NCSU goes on to write that they have also considered applicants in the social sciences as well. I suspect other programs also examine qualified applicants in mathematics as well. The problem you may have is to convince an admissions committee that your specific mathematics courses suggest you will be successful in their program.

The rest of your post is also puzzling. For example, you mention getting a physics related job and later transitioning to experimental work in physics. In practice, employers are very careful in their hiring. They realize they are making a lifetime committment. In my experience, it is easier to get into a graduate school than getting a job. The committment is less < 10 years, for the graduate school.

The good news is you may be able to get a "physics related" job without a full graduate degree in physics or at least an allied graduate degree in place of physics. For example, Ohio State University, offers a program in geodetic engineering/geodesy. Geodesy would allow you to use a (very) strong background in boundary value problems (potential theory), and linear algebra (adjustment computation and least squares), and mathematical physics in a rewarding career. You need not know circuit theory or antenna theory or quantum mechanics in graduate physics.

But it is unclear in your post, would you be happy outside of experimental work. If you have limited experience in experimental work, how do you know this is what you want to transition into. Are you a hobbyist. Do you do electronics, arduino, chemistry experiments. Did you like chemistry labs, physics labs, building telescopes, etc. Most experimental physicists I know were "hands-on" types.

The OSU program may even have some gravity measurement/ operational component, that may satisfy your "experimental" criteria desire. Geodesy is not just theory, it has some practical component. Job outlooks in this area are quite good. It is a lot less competitive than the physics academia route, although it is also professionally challenging.

My suggestion is to reword your post and give us a little at a time. Are you trying to get into a program or a job. Are you using your aptitude to learn physics on your own backing up your interest in pursuing a career in physics, in which case your attention to your desire to enter the experimental/laboratory aspects, of this career is a non-sequitur.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top