How to relate to math expressions that don’t have physical representations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the interpretation of mathematical expressions in physics that lack direct physical representations, specifically addressing the term c² in the context of relativity. Participants clarify that c² does not violate the speed of light but rather serves as a fundamental component in the equation for rest energy, defined as E=mc². The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the derivation and assumptions behind mathematical relationships in physics to grasp their meanings fully.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of energy-mass equivalence
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly wave equations
  • Mathematical proficiency in dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's mass-energy equivalence formula E=mc² in detail
  • Explore the implications of c² in various physical contexts
  • Investigate the principles of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Learn about quantum wave functions and their mathematical representations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in theoretical physics, quantum mechanics, and the mathematical foundations of physical laws.

rasp
Messages
117
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I’m wondering how to get comfortable in using math terms in physics equations that do not have physical meanings. I know the formulas work but what are we saying about the terms? For example, I’m thinking of i in quantum wave equation and c^2 in Relativity I mean as c is the highest speed possible, what is c^2. I understand speed ^2 satisfies the dimensions, but how can we employ a number which violates our understanding of the maximum speed?
Thread is contained in the summary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rasp said:
but how can we employ a number which violates our understanding of the maximum speed?

Why do you think c2 is a speed? Is an acre an length?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens
rasp said:
Summary:: I’m wondering how to get comfortable in using math terms in physics equations that do not have physical meanings. I know the formulas work but what are we saying about the terms? For example, I’m thinking of i in quantum wave equation and c^2 in Relativity I mean as c is the highest speed possible, what is c^2. I understand speed ^2 satisfies the dimensions, but how can we employ a number which violates our understanding of the maximum speed?

Thread is contained in the summary.
Nothing is violating the speed of light when we describe rest energy as being equal to the rest mass times the square of the speed of light. This is just what energy is and how it is defined.
 
Your understanding and appreciation of a mathematical relationship of physical variables is obtained from the derivation of that relationship and the assumptions and physical principles that are required to develop it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K