How to represent this absolute value inequality with constants?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
absolute value
Relevant Equations
inequality
see attached image, it asks to repesent it in x-graph
constant "a" isn't conditioned.
Do I need to separate it into a few cases of the constant a and represent each in one x-graph?
Screenshot 2021-03-09 140649.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
You should read that the formula means x is around a within distance ##\epsilon##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
PeroK said:
What do you mean by an x-graph? Do you mean on the x-axis?

yes. Sorry I am not in English language
 
anuttarasammyak said:
You should read that the formula means x is around a within distance ##\epsilon##.

a isn't conditioned, e.g. >0 or <0

so do I need to separate into a few cases and draw the graph??
 
OK . This is what I have done, I don't know if I am correct. I am teaching my cousin, but I have left school for 20 years
12231231313131.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Another question , I avoid starting a new topic. Am I correct??
66.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kenny1999 said:
OK . This is what I have done, I don't know if I am correct. I am teaching my cousin, but I have left school for 20 years
I think all you need to do is show one interval ##(a - \delta, a + \delta)##. You don't need all those different cases. The point ##x = 0## is not important here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and kenny1999
To make your diagram more clear, show ##a## on it. Then show ##a-\delta## and ##a+\delta##. There is no reason to even show where anything else, like ##x=0##, is. Then one diagram takes care of all the cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kenny1999
PeroK said:
I think all you need to do is show one interval ##(a - \delta, a + \delta)##. You don't need all those different cases. The point ##x = 0## is not important here.

Hi, did you mean I do not have to consider the possible ranges of value of a ? (Since a isn't conditioned but the delta is given that >0, that's why I am wondering if I need to separate a into different ranges of value
 
PeroK said:
I guess that's ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##?
No, "Another question" is really another, not related to the first question, yes the first question was ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##

I think the second question does NOT include x=0. How to draw a symbol to represent that x=0 isn't included?? an arrow??
 
kenny1999 said:
Hi, did you mean I do not have to consider the possible ranges of value of a ? (Since a isn't conditioned but the delta is given that >0, that's why I am wondering if I need to separate a into different ranges of value
You don't have to consider different values for ##a##.
 
kenny1999 said:
No, "Another question" is really another, not related to the first question, yes the first question was ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##

I think the second question does NOT include x=0. How to draw a symbol to represent that x=0 isn't included?? an arrow??
It's ##x =a## that is excluded. I would just use ##(a-\delta, a)(a, a + \delta)## with round brackets to show the end points are excluded.