MHB How to Rewrite Absolute Value Expressions Without Absolute Values?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on rewriting the expression |x + 3| + 4|x + 3| for x < -3 without using absolute values. It establishes that for x < -3, |x + 3| equals -(x + 3). The correct transformation leads to 5|x + 3| being rewritten as -5(x + 3), simplifying to -5x - 15. Participants clarify that combining terms and maintaining the correct operations is essential in the rewriting process. The final expression is presented as -5(x + 3), effectively eliminating the absolute value.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The | x | = x when x > or = 0.

The | x | = - x when x < 0.

Rewrite the following expression in a form that does not contain absolute value.

| x + 3 | + 4 | x + 3 |, where x < -3

-(x + 3) + 4 -(x + 3)

-x - 3 + 4 - x - 3

-2x - 6 + 4

-2x - 2

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
The | x | = x when x > or = 0.

The | x | = - x when x < 0.

Rewrite the following expression in a form that does not contain absolute value.

| x + 3 | + 4 | x + 3 |, where x < -3

-(x + 3) + 4 -(x + 3)

-x - 3 + 4 - x - 3

-2x - 6 + 4

-2x - 2

Correct?

No, you've turned multiplication into addition...we are given the expression:

$$|x+3|+4|x+3|$$ where $$x<-3$$

Now, the first thing I would do is combine like terms:

$$5|x+3|$$

Let's look at:

$$x<-3$$

Add 3 to both sides:

$$x+3<0$$

And so our expression becomes:

$$5(-(x+3))=-5(x+3)$$

We can stop here because we have rewritten the expression in a form not involving absolute value, and there's no need to distribute in my opinion. :D
 
|x + 3 | + 4 | x + 3 |, where x < -3

-(x + 3) - 4(x + 3)

-x - 3 - 4x - 12

-5x - 15

-5(x + 3)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K