How to show a series of functions is not uniformly convergent

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the non-uniform convergence of a series of functions, specifically the series ∑sin(x/n²). The original poster understands uniform convergence but struggles to find rigorous methods to prove non-uniform convergence, particularly when tests do not yield explicit conditions. They initially showed absolute convergence by comparing the series to ∑x/n² but now seek to establish uniform convergence using a series of constants. The challenge lies in demonstrating that for any chosen x, there exists a greater x that violates the M-Test inequality, indicating non-uniform convergence. The conversation highlights the need for clear methods to prove non-uniform convergence in mathematical analysis.
gregmoon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, I chose to ask about ways to determine if a series of functions is NOT uniformly convergent because I think that would best answer the overall difficulties I have with uniform convergence. I have a good idea of what uniform convergence is, I can give the definition, and if the problem is uniformly convergent there is a good chance I can show it. But if the problem is not then I don't think that "None of my tests work" is a rigorous mathematical argument to deny uniform convergence and none of the tests I have give explicit conditions for non-uniformity.

Homework Statement


Here is just one example. Show whether \sum \sin( \frac{x}{n^2}) converges uniformly for the interval "All x".

Homework Equations


The first time around I showed that this series was convergent by comparing it to \sum\frac{x}{n^2} and was thus able to show that it was absolutely convergent for all x.
\sum \left|\sin( \frac{x}{n^2})\right|\leq\sum\frac{x}{n^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now that I want to prove uniform convergence I'm wanting to do the same thing except I need to make the comparing series not dependent on x, make it a series of constants (which is essentialy the Weierstrass test, correct?). Unfortunately the way I see it, no matter what x I choose to make \sum\frac{x}{n^2} a constant, there will always be a greater x that will ruin the M-Test inequality. It is the connection from here to non-uniform convergence which I can't seem to make.

I appreciate any helpful comments. I also have a few other confusions which seem to result from the interval to be checked. Particularly when it is an open interval where the series of functions is undefined at either endpoint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh I want to ask the same thing. How can I prove something is *not* uniformly convergent?

Too bad there's no answer here. :confused:
 
Limn→∞sin(x/n2) = 0 for any fixed x.

Given any n can you find x s.t. |sin(x/n2) - 0| > 1/2? I'm letting epsilon = 1/2.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K