How to Simplify a Double Dot Product of Tensors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikphd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Tensor
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the double dot product of a second-order tensor with a fourth-order tensor using tensor properties. The original poster seeks clarification on how to expand this product into simpler forms and questions the relevance of such operations in modern differential geometry. Participants highlight that the double dot product is more commonly seen in continuum mechanics and suggest that the poster provide definitions and progress to receive better assistance. The conversation also touches on whether a fourth-order tensor can be represented as a dyad of two second-order tensors, emphasizing the need for symmetry in such representations. Overall, the discussion reveals a gap in understanding the application of tensor operations across different mathematical contexts.
nikphd
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Been a long time lurker, but first time poster. I hope I can be very thorough and descriptive. So, I have been battling with a double inner product of a 2nd order tensor with a 4th order one. So my question is:

How do we expand (using tensor properties) a double dot product of the basis vectors to a simpler one?

(e_ie_je_ke_l):(e_me_n)=?

and

(e_ie_j):(e_ke_le_me_n)=?

Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you missing the definitions or what exactly is the problem?
I haven't seen this being used before.
 
What exactly haven't you seen been used before? The double dot product of a tensor of n=4 with one of n=2? You mean you have only seen it being used for tensors of equal order?

The properties I am referring to, is actually expanding the double dot product to two single dot products!
 
Last edited:
The "double dot product". What I am saying is that you will rarely find this being used in modern differential geometry, for the plain reason that we have tensor products, contractions, etc. . I believe that this is the reason why you are not getting any responses. Moreover, this is a linear algebra question, not a geometry one.

Either way, if you provide the definitions in terms of said concepts and show how far you got, I am sure people will be able to help you.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Double dot is used extensively in continuum mechanics, even in 2014! For example, 4th order tensors represent orientation of rigid fibers in a 3D space, and 2nd order tensor is the velocity gradient of a flow field.
So should I move my question to the linear algebra section?
My basic question is this actually: "Is the following statement correct? D:uuuu=(D:uu)uu, meaning can i represent a 4th order tensor as a dyad of two 2nd order tensors?And if yes which are the requirements? Symmetry?" I thought it was a pretty straightforward question!
 
The product contracts the order of the 4th order tensor to a 2nd order tensor. i.e.
Aijkl ei ej ek el : Bmn em en = Aijkl Bmn ei ej dkm dln = Aijkl Bkl ei ej
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K