MHB How to solve following optimization problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter user_01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
AI Thread Summary
The optimization problem presented is defined as maximizing the expression ax + by^3 under the constraints 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 1. This problem is confirmed to be convex since it involves a convex function over a convex set. The KKT method can be applied, but the inequality constraints can be expressed using the constraint function g(x,y) = (-x, -y, x-1, y-1). The maximum value of the function is found to be a + b at the point (1, 1), while the minimum value is 0 at (0, 0). Thus, the analysis concludes that the optimal solution is achieved at the boundary of the defined constraints.
user_01
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The following is the mathematical expression for my model's rate expression. Variables $x,y$ are the controlling parameter, while the rest are positive constants.

$$\max_{x,y} \ ax + by^3 \ (s.t. \ 0\leq x \leq 1,\ 0\leq y\leq1)$$

Can I mathematically say that it is a convex problem within the limits of variables $x,y$?

The graph for the equation strictly follows the definition of convexity.
I have learned to solve the problems with KKT method, but I cannot understand how to resolve the inequality constraints $0 \leq (x,y) \leq 1$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
user_01 said:
The following is the mathematical expression for my model's rate expression. Variables $x,y$ are the controlling parameter, while the rest are positive constants.
$$\max_{x,y} \ ax + by^3 \ (s.t. \ 0\leq x \leq 1,\ 0\leq y\leq1)$$
Can I mathematically say that it is a convex problem within the limits of variables $x,y$?
The graph for the equation strictly follows the definition of convexity.

Wiki explains that a convex problem is the optimization of a convex function over a convex set.
So it is indeed a convex problem as both conditions are satisfied.

I have learned to solve the problems with KKT method, but I cannot understand how to resolve the inequality constraints $0 \leq (x,y) \leq 1$.
Those inequality constraints translate into the constraint function $\mathbf g(x,y) = (-x,-y,x-1,y-1)$ with $g_i(x,y) \le 0$.

Btw, we can already see by inspection that the optimum must be at $(x,y)=(1,1)$ with value $a+b$.
 
The derivative of $ax+ by^3$ with respect to x is the constant a. If a is not 0, that derivative is never 0 so any max or min must be on the boundary. That boundary consists of 4 pieces

1) x= 0, $0\le y\le 1$. The function reduces to $by^3$ on $0\le y\le 1$ which obviously has its minimum value, 0, at y= 0 and maximum value, b, at y= 1.
2) y= 0, $0\le x\le 1$. The function reduces to $ax$ on $0\le x\le 1$ which obviouslly has its minimum value, 0, at x= 0 and maximum value , a, a x=1.
3) x= 1, $0\le y\le 1$. The function reduces to $a+ by^3$ on $0\le y\le 1$ which obviouly has its minimum, a, at y= 0 and its maximum a+ b at y= 1.
4. y= 1, $0\le x\le 1$. The function reduces to $ax+ b$ on $0\le x\le 1$ which obviouslly has its minimum, b, at x= 0 and its maximum, a+ b at x= 1.

Over all, then, the maximum is a+ b which is achieved at (1, 1). The minimum value is 0 which is achieved at (0, 0).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top