How to solve for the spillover for a spherical container?o

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spherical brass shell containing a solid steel ball and mercury, with a focus on determining the volume of mercury that spills out when the temperature increases. The context includes thermal expansion and the constraints of a spherical container.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the volume of mercury and how it relates to the volumes of the steel ball and brass shell. There are questions about the appropriateness of the thermal expansion equation for hollow containers and how to account for the steel sphere's volume in the spillover calculation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the initial volume of mercury and how to calculate the spillover. Some guidance has been offered on using the thermal expansion formula and considering the total volumes before and after expansion.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty about the initial volume of mercury due to the presence of the steel sphere, and participants are discussing how to adjust calculations accordingly. The problem is complicated by the spherical shape of the container, which raises questions about the application of standard spillover equations.

HelloMrCo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spherical brass shell has an interior volume of 1.60 x 10-3m^3. Within this interior volume is a solid steel ball that has a volume of 0.70 x 10-3m^3. The space between the steel ball and the inner surface of the brass shell is filled completely with mercury. A small hole is drilled through the brass, and the temperature of the arrangement is increased by 12 celsius degree. What is the volume of the mercury that spills out of the hole?

Homework Equations


Delta V = B*Vo*Delta t

The Attempt at a Solution


Delta V(Mercury) = 3.49e-6 m^3
Delta V(Brass) = 1.09e-6 m^3
Delta V(Steel) = 3.02e-7 m^3

I've already computed for all of the changes in volume for the two spheres and the mercury. I'm having a problem on how to solve for the spillover because from our previous examples there are no spherical containers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first thought is that the interior volume of the brass (if your equation is appropriate for hollow containers as well) is the limiting factor.
If the original arrangement was full...then any change in the total volume of the contents (mercury and steel) exceeding the change in volume of the container (brass) will be the volume that spills out.
 
RUber said:
My first thought is that the interior volume of the brass (if your equation is appropriate for hollow containers as well) is the limiting factor.
If the original arrangement was full...then any change in the total volume of the contents (mercury and steel) exceeding the change in volume of the container (brass) will be the volume that spills out.
So what would be the equation now if that is the case?
 
RUber said:
My first thought is that the interior volume of the brass (if your equation is appropriate for hollow containers as well) is the limiting factor.
If the original arrangement was full...then any change in the total volume of the contents (mercury and steel) exceeding the change in volume of the container (brass) will be the volume that spills out.
Side note: I'm using the equations that our professor gave us about thermal expansion and the equation for a regular spillover is:

Spillover = Delta V(Liquid) - Delta V(Container)

I also don't have an idea how to solve for the spillover with another material inside the container.
 
How did you determine the initial volume of mercury?
 
gneill said:
How did you determine the initial volume of mercury?
It is stated in the problem that the sphere brass was filled with mercury so that means it is the same volume.
 
HelloMrCo said:
It is stated in the problem that the sphere brass was filled with mercury so that means it is the same volume.
What about the steel sphere that's also taking up space inside the brass shell?
 
gneill said:
What about the steel sphere that's also taking up space inside the brass shell?
So that means I have to subtract the volume of the steel sphere to the volume of the brass sphere in order to get the volume of the mercury. But still I have the problem on how to get the spillover because it is a whole different equation since the container is spherical.
 
HelloMrCo said:
So that means I have to subtract the volume of the steel sphere to the volume of the brass sphere in order to get the volume of the mercury. But still I have the problem on how to get the spillover because it is a whole different equation since the container is spherical.
The volumes will change according to the expansion formula in the same way regardless of their shapes, so you can determine the initial volume available for mercury inside the structure and then the volume that's available after the materials expand. You'll have a new mercury volume and the amount space available inside the container... what doesn't fit is what spills out.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
The volumes will change according to the expansion formula in the same way regardless of their shapes, so you can determine the initial volume available for mercury inside the structure and then the volume that's available after the materials expand. You'll have a new mercury volume and the amount space available inside the container... what doesn't fit is what spills out.
So I'll still be using the same formula that was given to me when solving for a regular spillover but with the addition of the steel sphere. So the equation will be:
Spillover = Delta V(Mercury) + Delta V(Steel) - Delta V(Container)
Is this right?
 
  • #11
HelloMrCo said:
So I'll still be using the same formula that was given to me when solving for a regular spillover but with the addition of the steel sphere. So the equation will be:
Spillover = Delta V(Mercury) + Delta V(Steel) - Delta V(Container)
Is this right?
That should work.

Personally I find it easier to think in terms of before and after total volumes, but it reduces to the "Delta" approach if you lay out the math.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
That should work.

Personally I find it easier to think in terms of before and after total volumes, but it reduces to the "Delta" approach if you lay out the math.
Hey thanks for helping me! I was having a really hard time solving this problem.
 
  • #13
HelloMrCo said:
Hey thanks for helping me! I was having a really hard time solving this problem.
You're welcome. Glad to help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K