Volumetric Expansion of Liquids

  • Thread starter Thread starter chunkytuna21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Liquids
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the height change of a mercury column in a thermometer due to volumetric expansion as the temperature rises from 10°C to 94°C. The context includes the initial volume of mercury and the dimensions of the thermometer's bore.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the volumetric expansion formula and the relationship between volume change and height change in a cylindrical bore. Questions arise about the relevance of the bore diameter and the accuracy of the initial volume used in calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the calculations and questioning the accuracy of their inputs. Some have confirmed the correct approach to relate volume change to height change, while others are still troubleshooting their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding unit conversions and the initial volume of mercury, with some participants questioning the realism of the given volume for a thermometer. The problem constraints include the neglect of any change in the quartz volume.

chunkytuna21
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
A thermometer has a quartz body within which is sealed a total volume of 0.400 cm3 of mercury. The stem contains a cylindrical hole with a bore diameter of 0.10 mm. How far does the mercury column extend in the process of rising from 10°C to 94°C? Neglect any change in volume of the quartz.


delta V= B*V0*delta T


I thought this problem would be pretty simple. I have the equation from my textbook along with the value for B so I just plugged them in: delta V= (182*10^-6)(0.400cm3)(84)= 0.0061152. Now, this is where I'm stuck. This isn't the answer and I don't know what to do with this number. I'm starting to think this isn't even the right equation. Does the 10mm come into the problem somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the 10 mm is crucial. You have calculated the change in volume. You need the change in height. Assuming that the cross-sectional area remains the same, how much extra height does this change in volume result in?
 
Last edited:
How do I solve for the extra height? Is there an equation for that?
 
Last edited:
Imagine watching a thermometer as the temperature rises from 10 to 94 degrees. The mercury rises, and you can imagine the extra mercury as being held within a cylinder. You've calculated the cylinder's volume, and you have its diameter, so how do you calculate height?
 
V= (Pi)(R^2)(l), solving for l. Right?
 
Yup, exactly.
 
Thanks. Now, I just have to go back and rework my math. I'm still getting the wrong answer.
 
I'm getting an unrealistic answer. Are you sure the numbers you gave are right? 0.4 cm^3 seems like a lot of mercury for a thermometer.
 
The question is right. I copied and pasted it exactly. Plus, I'm looking at it on webassign right now. I think it's my calculated change in volume. Delta T would be 84 because that's the change in temperature and B is given in a chart in my textbook and V0 would have to be the initial volume of 0.400cm3. So, I really don't know what's wrong. I would convert from cm to m, but they want the answer in cm. Unless it's the wrong equation.
 
  • #10
I'm getting a reasonable number. Check your unit conversion on that diameter again.
 
  • #11
ideasrule said:
I'm getting an unrealistic answer. Are you sure the numbers you gave are right? 0.4 cm^3 seems like a lot of mercury for a thermometer.

Not really. You should see the ones used for calorimetry.
 
  • #12
When you say a reasonable number, are we talking about a small decimal number or a number in the thousands? Because everytime I work the problem out, I get one or the other.
 
  • #13
I'm getting a number in the dozens.
How many cm in 0.10 mm? (looks like you changed it from 0.10mm to 10mm in the middle of your original post, so I suspect you're using the wrong number)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I finally got it. Thanks for all the help everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K