MHB How to Solve Investment Word Problems Involving Interest Rates and Profits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bergausstein
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the investment problem involving a trust fund, the equation derived shows that an additional $32,000 should be invested at 8.5% to achieve an overall return of 8% on the total investment. For the second scenario, where a businessman invests $12,000 in two ventures with different profit and loss rates, the equations x + y = 12,000 and 0.08x - 0.04y = 120 can be used to find the amounts invested in each venture. By substituting and eliminating variables, the solution can be derived. The method involves solving for one variable and substituting it back to find the other. This approach effectively addresses both investment scenarios involving interest rates and profits.
bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
1. A trust fund has invested \$8000 at 6% annual interest.
How much additional money should be invested at
8.5% to obtain a return of 8% on the total amount
invested?

my solution,

let
$n=$amount invested @ 8.5%

$0.06(8000)+0.085n=0.08(8000+n)$

$480+0.085n=640+0.08n$

$0.085n-0.08n=640-480$

$n=32,000$

\$32,000 is the addtional money should be invested at 8.5%. is this correct?

2. A businessman invested a total of \$12,000 in two ven-tures. In one he made a profit of 8% and in the other he
lost 4%. If his net profit for the year was $120, how
much did he invest in each venture?

in this problem i don't know how will i represent the amount invested in the other venture. please help. thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.) Correct.

2.) Let $x$ represent the first investment amount and $y$ represent the other. So we know:

$$x+y=12000$$

And we also know:

$$0.08x-0.04y=120$$

which I would rewrite as:

$$2x-y=3000$$

Now, add the two equations to eliminate $y$, then solve for $x$, then use this value of $x$ in either of the two equations to determine $y$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top