How to Solve Two Masses Connected by a Spring in Ground Frame of Reference?
- Thread starter NTesla
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Spring
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
43 replies · 12K views
Physics news on Phys.org
NTesla
- 276
- 28
@anuttarasammyak, Perhaps I hadn't made the question clear in my earlier post. I do understand the calculation part of it. What I couldn't understand is that what is the physical significance of the variable which you have double differentiated in the equation:anuttarasammyak said:[tex]\ddot{(x_2-x_1)}=-k(1/m_1+1/m_2)(x_2-x_1-l_0)+F_2/m_2-F_1/m_1[/tex]
You see RHS second term ##F_2/m_2-F_1/m_1## is constant.
You see RHS first term is written as
[tex]-k(1/m_1+1/m_2)(x_2-x_1-l_0)=-k(1/m_1+1/m_2)(x_2-x_1) - k(1/m_1+1/m_2)(-l_0)[/tex]
the second term is constant.
Add these two constants and express it as
[tex]k(1/m_1+1/m_2)l[/tex]
introducing new constant ##l##. Show me expression of ##l## by F,m,k and l_0.
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 3,230
- 1,633
You observe that this is equation of harmonic oscillation : displacement ##x_2-x_1-l##, angular frequency ##\omega##.NTesla said:What I couldn't understand is that what is the physical significance of the variable which you have double differentiated in the equation:
l is new "natural length" of spring with ##F_1## and ##F_2## applied. ##x_2-x_1-l## is extension of spring from renewed balance point. See also HINT in my previous post.
Last edited:
NTesla
- 276
- 28
@anuttarasammyak,anuttarasammyak said:You observe that this is equation of harmonic oscillation : displacement ##x_2-x_1-l##, angular frequency ##\omega##.
l is new "natural length" of spring with ##F_1## and ##F_2## applied. ##x_2-x_1-l## is extension of spring from renewed balance point. See also HINT in my previous post.
Since ##x_1, x_2## are coordinates of masses at any instant.
##l##=##x_2-x_1##. Therefore, ##x_2-x_1-l## = ##x_2-x_1-x_2+x_1## = ##0## always. So there is no reason why this should be differentiated wrt time.
Last edited:
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 3,230
- 1,633
You have done the calculation so know that ##l## is constant. So your ##l##=##x_2-x_1## means spring between block 1 and block 2 does not change its length like a rod, though the equation is that of harmonic oscillation. Do I catch you right ?NTesla said:Since ##x_1, x_2## are coordinates of masses at any instant.
##l##=##x_2-x_1##. Therefore, ##x_2-x_1-l## = ##x_2-x_1-x_2+x_1## = ##0## always. So there is no reason why this should be differentiated wrt time.
NTesla
- 276
- 28
I'm trying to understand your calculation in post #4. You have taken ##x_1,x_2## as coordinates.anuttarasammyak said:You have done the calculation so know that ##l## is constant. So your ##l##=##x_2-x_1## means spring between block 1 and block 2 does not change its length like a rod, though the equation is that of harmonic oscillation. Do I catch you right ?
##l## is the length of string at any instant of time. It is not a constant. ##l## changes wrt time.
##l##=##x_2-x_1##, considering that ##x_1, x_2## are coordinates of the masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.
But, the value of ##x_2-x_1-l=0## always.
Last edited:
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 3,230
- 1,633
Hi. My l is
Your l is
So the equation is written as
[tex]\ddot{(l_{yours}-l_{mine})}+\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})=0[/tex]
where
[tex]\omega^2=k(1/m_1+1/m_2)[/tex]
[tex]l_{mine}=l_0+\frac{F_2/m_2-F_1/m_1}{\omega^2}[/tex], constant, and
[tex]l_{yours}=x_2-x_1=l_{yours}(t)[/tex] function of time.
##l_{yours}-l_{mine}## is elongation of spring not from its natural length ##l_0## but from ##l_{mine}## which is interpreted as altered natural length under external constant forces.
anuttarasammyak said:[tex]l-l_0=\frac{F_2/m_2-F_1/m_1}{\omega^2}[/tex]
Your l is
NTesla said:It is not a constant. ##l## changes wrt time.
##l##=##x_2-x_1##, considering that ##x_1, x_2## are coordinates of the masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.
But, the value of ##x_2-x_1-l=0## always.
So the equation is written as
[tex]\ddot{(l_{yours}-l_{mine})}+\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})=0[/tex]
where
[tex]\omega^2=k(1/m_1+1/m_2)[/tex]
[tex]l_{mine}=l_0+\frac{F_2/m_2-F_1/m_1}{\omega^2}[/tex], constant, and
[tex]l_{yours}=x_2-x_1=l_{yours}(t)[/tex] function of time.
##l_{yours}-l_{mine}## is elongation of spring not from its natural length ##l_0## but from ##l_{mine}## which is interpreted as altered natural length under external constant forces.
Last edited:
- 42,978
- 10,571
If m1 moves x1 to the left and m2 moves x2 to the right then that shifts the "mass moment" m2 x2 - m1 x1 to the right, so (m1+m2)Δs = m2 x2 - m1 x1, where Δs is positive to the right.NTesla said:@haruspex ,
I've tried to find a relation between CoM's displacement and ##x_1## and ##x_2##, but it appears more difficult than I assumed it to be. Here's my work: View attachment 273350
I am not able to figure out the relation. let me know how to proceed.
- 42,978
- 10,571
Not sure if that's what you meant. There's no problem explaining that; do you mean, how do we use it?NTesla said:@haruspex, Thank you so much. That was very helpful.
Just one question: If we do not resort to center of mass FoR, and work solely in Ground FoR, then how can we explain that the maximum elongation will happen when both the masses have same velocity as that of velocity of com ?
Isn't it the same as saying the two masses have the same velocity?
NTesla
- 276
- 28
@haruspex,
When working in CoM FoR, both the masses will seem to be moving in opposite direction and maximum extension in spring will happen when velocity of both the masses is equal to zero at the same instant.
However, when working in Ground FoR, the bodies might seem to be moving in same direction, but maximum extension of spring will happen when both the masses have same speed in same direction. Will it be right to say so.? If yes, then is there an intuitive way to explain that this is the only way possible for string to have maximum elongation in Ground FoR ?
When working in CoM FoR, both the masses will seem to be moving in opposite direction and maximum extension in spring will happen when velocity of both the masses is equal to zero at the same instant.
However, when working in Ground FoR, the bodies might seem to be moving in same direction, but maximum extension of spring will happen when both the masses have same speed in same direction. Will it be right to say so.? If yes, then is there an intuitive way to explain that this is the only way possible for string to have maximum elongation in Ground FoR ?
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 3,230
- 1,633
Hi.
[tex]\dot{l_{yours}}=0[/tex]
It means
[tex]\dot{x_1}=\dot{x_2}[/tex]
When it is maximum extension
[tex]\ddot{l_{yours}}=-\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})< 0[/tex]
For minimum shrink
[tex]\ddot{l_{yours}}=-\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})> 0[/tex]
At extreme pointsNTesla said:If yes, then is there an intuitive way to explain that this is the only way possible for string to have maximum elongation in Ground FoR ?
[tex]\dot{l_{yours}}=0[/tex]
It means
[tex]\dot{x_1}=\dot{x_2}[/tex]
When it is maximum extension
[tex]\ddot{l_{yours}}=-\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})< 0[/tex]
For minimum shrink
[tex]\ddot{l_{yours}}=-\omega^2(l_{yours}-l_{mine})> 0[/tex]
- 42,978
- 10,571
If the two masses have different velocities in the ground frame then they are either getting closer or further apart. If closer, they must have been further apart earlier; if further apart, they will be at max separation later. So when at max, the relative velocity must be zero.NTesla said:@haruspex,
When working in CoM FoR, both the masses will seem to be moving in opposite direction and maximum extension in spring will happen when velocity of both the masses is equal to zero at the same instant.
However, when working in Ground FoR, the bodies might seem to be moving in same direction, but maximum extension of spring will happen when both the masses have same speed in same direction. Will it be right to say so.? If yes, then is there an intuitive way to explain that this is the only way possible for string to have maximum elongation in Ground FoR ?
NTesla
- 276
- 28
@anuttarasammyak and @haruspex : Thank you so much. Your contribution was very helpful and is very much appreciated.
Similar threads
- palaphys
- · Replies 20 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 20
- member 731016
- · Replies 6 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 6
- JoeyBob
- · Replies 18 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 18
- runningphysics
- · Replies 1 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 1
- Istiak
- · Replies 16 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 16
- Jahnavi
- · Replies 18 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 18
- Mongster
- · Replies 7 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 7
- vielendank
- · Replies 4 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 4
- Owen443
- · Replies 5 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 5
- grandpa2390
- · Replies 3 ·
- Introductory Physics Homework Help
- Replies
- 3