How to Use Duality in Computational Electromagnetic Problems

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the duality in electromagnetic fields, specifically the field combination ##E+iB##, which adheres to a Schrödinger equation. This combination is noted for its relevance in classical radiation and scattering phenomena, highlighting its role in understanding electromagnetic behavior. The counterpart, ##E-iB##, follows a separate Schrödinger equation, indicating a deeper relationship between these field representations. The conversation hints at the intriguing overlap between classical and quantum mechanics in this context. Overall, the exploration of these field combinations reveals significant insights into electromagnetic theory.
Paul Colby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,576
Reaction score
486
Some weeks ago I happened across a post that caught my eye. Dale asked a question about the number of photons in an electromagnetic field. His question was answered in full but what caught my attention in the discussion was seeing a familiar friend; the rather odd field combination, ##E+iB## [1]. The impetus for Dale’s question centered on ##E+iB## obeying a Schrödinger equation, $$i\frac{d}{dt}(E+iB) = \nabla\times(E+iB).$$
My interest in this field combination is its application to classical radiation and scattering phenomena. First, we need to point out that ##E+iB## is only half of Maxwell’s equation. The other half is taken up by its friend, ##E-iB## obeying a new and completely separate Schrödinger equation, $$i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(E-iB) = -\nabla\times(E-iB).$$
What’s shown here is rather interesting...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Dale, jim mcnamara, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Cool, I just saw this. I didn't know that E+iB has a classical application too! Or maybe this is kind of straddling the classical/quantum fence
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
494
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K