How to Write a Dynamical Equation for a Simple Rigid Body System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dankaroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a dynamical equation for a rigid body system involving a massless rod pivoting at a point, with a weight and spring acting on it. The original poster attempts to formulate the equation based on forces acting on the system, including gravity and spring force, while considering small displacements from equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between forces and motion, questioning the role of angular quantities and the implications of the rod's length. Some suggest using moments or conservation of energy, while others express uncertainty about the inclusion of angular velocity and its effects on the dynamical equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on how to incorporate angular motion into the equation. There is recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between displacement, angular position, and forces acting on the system, though no consensus has been reached on the final form of the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the definitions of displacement and angular quantities, as well as the need to include all relevant forces in the equation. The original poster's assumptions about the system's setup and parameters are also under scrutiny.

dankaroll
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume a rigid body with a massless rod that pivots about point O. Displacement x is measured from equilibrium position. Assuming x is small, that the weight at the end of the rod is 5N and spring constant is 400n/m, obtain the dynamical equation of the system.

hw31.jpg



Homework Equations



\sum f =ma
f= -kx

The Attempt at a Solution



When I look at the system, I see only two forces acting on it. One of which is gravity, and one of which is the force of the spring. So I come up with

ma=-kx-mg , so

m\ddot{x}=-kx-mg

My intuition tells me something is missing though, since the length of the rod is given. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dankaroll! :smile:
dankaroll said:
My intuition tells me something is missing though, since the length of the rod is given. Any suggestions?

Yeees :redface:

you're using x to mean two different distances, aren't you? :wink:

(and either take moments, or use conservation of energy :smile:)
 
Are you talking about finding the actual distance x the ball drops down once the 5N force is applied?

I would think you take a moment at point O to find the force of the spring the instant after the system is released.. which would give you

\sum Mo=0 ; 5N(3a)+(kx)(a)=0
kx= (5N*3a)/(a) = (10a N)

so from there you can find the displacement of the spring, which is

x=(10a N)/(400N/m) = .025a

so then you can find the angle, and then the distance that the ball drops,

x= .025(3a) = .075a

which would be the max distance the ball would drop, since over time the system would lose energy. am i right?:biggrin:
 
You're asked for the dynamical equation of the system.

In other words, how does x (or x') depend on t (or how does x' depend on x)?

Where in your equations is any reference to the speed (x'), or the angular speed?
 
my only question is, wouldn't angular velocity introduce a theta term into the dynamical equation? how would you handle that?
 
Ok, well I see that angular acceleration is equal to tangental accel/radius

and angular velocity is equal to tangental velocity / radius

and angular position is equal to tangental position / radius

so...

(1/3)m\ddot{x}=-(1/3)\dot{x}-kx

on to something?
 
dankaroll said:
my only question is, wouldn't angular velocity introduce a theta term into the dynamical equation? how would you handle that?

The question keeps mentioning the displacement x, not the angle, so it clearly wants an answer in terms of x, not the angle.

If you insist on using angle, you can calculate it from x and a. But the rod is massless, and you can assume the rigid body is a point mass, so just use its ordinary velocity, not its angular velocity.
 
dankaroll said:
(1/3)m\ddot{x}=-(1/3)\dot{x}-kx

I don't really understand what you're doing …

where is g? where is a? why 1/3 ? :confused:
 
I used 1/3 because the conversion from angular to tangential is a/r or v/r.. and the ball is 3a away.

The equation should have the input force in it though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K