MHB How to Write a Quadratic Equation Given Its Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abbarajum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
To write a quadratic equation given its roots, the roots provided were (-1 + sqrt(-2))/5 and its conjugate. The initial equation derived was f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5), but the constant term (3/5) raises questions about integer coefficients. It's clarified that the constant term is indeed a coefficient, and the equation can be adjusted by multiplying through by 5 to achieve integer coefficients. A correct approach involves ensuring that the entire equation is scaled appropriately to maintain the integrity of the roots.
abbarajum
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abbarajum said:
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?

How did you get that equation? When I worked it out I got [math]x^2 - \dfrac{2}{5}x + \dfrac{3}{25}[/math].

What you've done means the 5 is only distributed to the $$x^2$$ instead the whole equation - a good way to check your work is to work out if the solution to the equation is what you started with

The constant term can be considered a coefficient (of [math]x^0[/math]). Can you not multiply through by 5 again to give you: $$f(x) = \dfrac{1}{25}(25x^2-10x+3)$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top