MHB How to Write a Quadratic Equation Given Its Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abbarajum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
Click For Summary
To write a quadratic equation given its roots, the roots provided were (-1 + sqrt(-2))/5 and its conjugate. The initial equation derived was f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5), but the constant term (3/5) raises questions about integer coefficients. It's clarified that the constant term is indeed a coefficient, and the equation can be adjusted by multiplying through by 5 to achieve integer coefficients. A correct approach involves ensuring that the entire equation is scaled appropriately to maintain the integrity of the roots.
abbarajum
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abbarajum said:
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?

How did you get that equation? When I worked it out I got [math]x^2 - \dfrac{2}{5}x + \dfrac{3}{25}[/math].

What you've done means the 5 is only distributed to the $$x^2$$ instead the whole equation - a good way to check your work is to work out if the solution to the equation is what you started with

The constant term can be considered a coefficient (of [math]x^0[/math]). Can you not multiply through by 5 again to give you: $$f(x) = \dfrac{1}{25}(25x^2-10x+3)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K