MHB How to Write a Quadratic Equation Given Its Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abbarajum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
To write a quadratic equation given its roots, the roots provided were (-1 + sqrt(-2))/5 and its conjugate. The initial equation derived was f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5), but the constant term (3/5) raises questions about integer coefficients. It's clarified that the constant term is indeed a coefficient, and the equation can be adjusted by multiplying through by 5 to achieve integer coefficients. A correct approach involves ensuring that the entire equation is scaled appropriately to maintain the integrity of the roots.
abbarajum
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abbarajum said:
Hi everyone.

I was given a problem in which the roots of a quadratic function were given. Using those roots, I had to write the quadratic function, with integer coeffecients only.

The roots were: (-1+ (sqrt -2))/5 and its conjugate.

The equation I have so far is: f(x) = 5(x^2) + 2x + (3/5)

I used the sum and the product of roots to get this. My question is this. Is the constant term (3/5) considered a coeffecient? I ask this because I am not sure how to get all of these numbers to be integers. If it is considered a coeffecient, then should I use completing the square to rewrite the equation?

How did you get that equation? When I worked it out I got [math]x^2 - \dfrac{2}{5}x + \dfrac{3}{25}[/math].

What you've done means the 5 is only distributed to the $$x^2$$ instead the whole equation - a good way to check your work is to work out if the solution to the equation is what you started with

The constant term can be considered a coefficient (of [math]x^0[/math]). Can you not multiply through by 5 again to give you: $$f(x) = \dfrac{1}{25}(25x^2-10x+3)$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top