How was the integral of 1/x defined?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gsingh2011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definition and derivation of the integral of 1/x, particularly from the perspective of how it relates to the natural logarithm function, ln(x). Participants explore both the conceptual and mathematical aspects of this relationship, including definitions, properties, and implications of ln(x) as an integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about whether the integral of 1/x can be derived or if it is merely a definition, questioning how one could know the integral yields ln(x).
  • Others suggest that ln(x) can be defined as the integral of 1/x from 1 to x, leading to various properties of ln(x) being derived from this definition.
  • Some participants argue that defining ln(x) as the integral of 1/x does not inherently explain why the integral follows a logarithmic relationship.
  • A participant proposes that one can prove properties of ln(x) by exploring its behavior under multiplication and differentiation.
  • Another participant provides a detailed derivation of the derivative of ln(x) to illustrate that it equals 1/x, suggesting this as a form of proof for the relationship.
  • Several participants reference external resources, such as videos and graphical explanations, to support their points or seek further clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the integral of 1/x is a definition or a derivation. There are multiple competing views on how to understand the relationship between the integral and the logarithmic function, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in understanding the integral's relationship to logarithmic functions, including assumptions about continuity and differentiability, as well as the need for rigorous definitions.

gsingh2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
I looked up the derivation for the fact that the integral of 1/x from 1 to infinity is ln(x), but I couldn't find anything. If you have one I would love to see it.

A lot of people were saying stuff like "It's a definition. You can't derive it". Is that correct? If so how could anyone know that the integral of 1/x from 1 to infinity is ln(x)? It seems like someone must have had a derivation to know that...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know you wanted the integral but here is a video describing the derivative of [tex]ln(x)[/tex] is equal to [tex]1/x[/tex], which might be useful.
 
Well, an equally good question is, what is ln x?

We CAN define it as the integral of 1/x, though perhaps you might be more familiar with it being the inverse of e^x.

In which case, consider the following:
[tex] e^{\ln x} = x \ \<br /> Thus... \ \ <br /> \frac{d(e^{\ln x})}{dx} = 1[/tex]

By the chain rule...

[tex] e^{\ln x} \frac{d(\ln x)}{dx} = 1[/tex]

But we know e^ln x = x so...

[tex] \frac{d(\ln x)}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]
 
l'Hôpital said:
Well, an equally good question is, what is ln x?

We CAN define it as the integral of 1/x, though perhaps you might be more familiar with it being the inverse of e^x.

In which case, consider the following:
[tex] e^{\ln x} = x \ \<br /> Thus... \ \ <br /> \frac{d(e^{\ln x})}{dx} = 1[/tex]

By the chain rule...

[tex] e^{\ln x} \frac{d(\ln x)}{dx} = 1[/tex]

But we know e^ln x = x so...

[tex] \frac{d(\ln x)}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

That makes sense, but isn't that a derivation and not a definition? And in response to the question what is ln(x), you could define a quantity called natural log of x as the integral of 1/x but how would you know that the integral would follow a logarithmic relationship, let alone a relationship with a base e.

Also, kevin_axion, i did not see any video.
 
You can, in fact start by defining
[tex]ln(x)= \int_1^x \frac{1}{t}dt[/tex]
From that, because 1/x is continuous for all positive x but not defined for x= 0, we can immediately conclude:
1) ln(x) is defined for all positive x
2) it is continuous and differentiable for all positive x.
3) its derivative is 1/x which is positive for all positive x
4) so ln(x) is an increasing function.
5) [itex]ln(1)= \int_1^1 dt/t= 0[/itex]
6) so ln(x)< 0 for 0<x< 1 and ln(x)> 0 for 1< x.

7) If x is any positive number, then so is 1/x and, by this definition
[tex]ln(1/x)= \int_1^{1/x} \frac{1}{t}dt[/tex]
Let u= xt so that t= u/x and dt= du/x. 1/t= x/u so (1/t)dt= (x/u)(du/x)= du/u.
When t= 1, u= x and when t= 1/x, u= 1 so
[tex]ln(1/x)= \int_x^1 \frac{1}{u}du= -\int_1^x\frac{1}{u}du= -ln(x)[/tex]

8) If x and y are both positive the so is xy and, by this definition,
[tex]ln(xy)= \int_1^{xy} \frac{1}{t}dt[/tex]

Let u= t/x so that t= xu and dt= xdu. Then dt/t= (xdu)/xu= du/u. When t= 1, u= 1/x and when t= xy, u= y so
[tex]ln(xy)= \int_{1/x}^y \frac{1}{u}du= \int_{1/x}^1 \frac{1}{u}du+ \int_1^y \frac{1}{u}du[/tex]
[tex]= -\int_1^{1/x} \frac{1}{u}du+ \int_1^y \frac{1}{u}du= -ln(1/x)+ ln(y)[/tex]
[tex]= -(-ln(x))+ ln(y)= ln(x)+ ln(y)[/tex]

9) If x is a positive real number and y is any real number, then [itex]x^y[/itex] is a positive real number and, by this definition,
[tex]ln(x^y)= \int_1^{x^y} \frac{1}{t}dt[/tex]

If y is not 0, let [itex]u= t^{1/y}[/itex] so that [itex]t= u^y[/itex] and [itex]dt= y u^{y-1}du[/itex] and [itex]dt/t= yu^{y-1}du/u^y= y du/u[/itex]. When t= 1 u= 1 and when [itex]t= x^y[/itex] u= x so
[tex]ln(y^x)= y\int_1^x \frac{1}{u}du= y ln(x)[/itex].<br /> <br /> If y= 0, then [itex]x^y= x^0= 1[/itex] so [itex]ln(x^y)= ln(1)= 0= 0 ln(x)[/itex] so that "[itex]ln(y^x)= y ln(x)[/itex] for any real y.<br /> <br /> 10) Since ln(x) is continuous and differentiable for all positive real numbers, we can apply the <b>mean value theorem</b> to any interval of positive real number and, in particular to the interval [1, 2]. <br /> [tex]\frac{ln(2)- ln(1)}{2- 1}= \frac{ln(2)- 0}{1}= ln(2)[/tex] <br /> and the mean value theorem says there must be some number, c, between 0 and 1 such that ln(2) is equal to the derivative at c: ln(2)= 1/c. Since c< 2, 1/c> 1/2 and it follows that ln(2)> 1/2. That is important because we can say that, for any positive real number, X, [itex]ln(2^{2X})= 2X ln(2)> 2X(1/2)= X[/itex]. That is, given any positive real number, there exist x such that ln(x) is larger- ln(x) is NOT bounded above.<br /> <br /> Since ln(x) is an increasing function, it follows that [itex]\lim_{x\to \infty} ln(x)= \infty[/itex]. Also, since ln(1/x)= -ln(x), [itex]\lim_{x\to 0}ln(x)= \lim_{y\to \infty} ln(1/y)= -\lim_{y\to\inty} ln(y)= -\infty[/itex]. That is, ln(x) is a one-to-one function mapping the set of all positive real numbers <b>onto</b> the set of all real numbers.<br /> <br /> Therefore, ln(x) has an inverse function, which I will call "Exp(x)" from the set of all real numbers to the set of all positive real numbers. All of the properties of "Exp(x)", such as the fact that the derivative of Exp(x) is again Exp(x), that Exp(x+ y)= Exp(x)Exp(y), etc. can be derived from the corresponding ln laws above but the crucial point, answering your question, is this:<br /> <br /> If y= Exp(x), then, by definition of "inverse" function, x= ln(y). <b>If x is not 0</b>, we can divide both sides of the equation by it: [itex]1= (1/x)ln(y)= ln(y^{1/x})[/itex]. Now go back to the "exponential" form: [itex]y^{1/x}= Exp(1)[/itex] from which it follows that [itex]y= (Exp(1))^x[/itex]. If x= 0, then y= Exp(0)= 1 because ln(1)= 0 and [itex]y= 1= Exp(1)^0= Exp(1)^x[/itex]. That is, for all x, [itex]Exp(x)= Exp(1)^x[/itex] so that Exp(x), the inverse of ln(x), really is an exponential function. We can, of course, define e= Exp(1) to get that the inverse to ln(x) is [itex]e^x[/itex][/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gsingh2011 said:
That makes sense, but isn't that a derivation and not a definition? And in response to the question what is ln(x), you could define a quantity called natural log of x as the integral of 1/x but how would you know that the integral would follow a logarithmic relationship, let alone a relationship with a base e.

Also, kevin_axion, i did not see any video.

You can prove it.

Let

[tex] F(x) = \int_{1}^{x} \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex]

You can easily show things like F(x) + F(y) = F(xy) . I'll let you play with that for a while but the point is, you can infact do it. With this definition, you can define 'e' to be the value of x such that F(x) = 1 and things like that.

EDIT: Halls beat me to the punch with a much better one haha.
 
Last edited:
You can prove it by differentiating ln(x). Watch:

[tex]f(x) = ln(x)[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = lim_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{ln(x+h)-ln(x)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= lim_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{ln\left(\frac{x+h}{x}\right)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= lim_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{ln\left(1 + \frac{h}{x}\right)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= lim_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{1}{x} \frac{x}{h} ln\left(1+ \frac{h}{x}\right)[/tex]

Now define t=x/h. Then...

[tex]= lim_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{1}{x} t ln\left(1+ \frac{1}{t}\right)[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{x} lim_{h\rightarrow0} ln\left(\left(1+\frac{1}{t}\right)^t\right)[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{x} ln\left( lim_{h\rightarrow0} \left(1+\frac{1}{t}\right)^t\right)[/tex]

As h approaches 0, t approaches infinity...

[tex]= \frac{1}{x} ln\left( lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{t}\right)^t\right)[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{x} ln(e)[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

Q.E.D.
 
Yea, sorry about that: http://www.khanacademy.org/video/proof--d-dx-ln-x----1-x?playlist=Calculus .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have seen some very good explanations with graphs showing that : d(ln x) / dx = 1/x
including this one by Dodo, post #6 https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=215045
I would like to see a graphical explanation of : integral (1 to x) 1/t dt = ln x
(besides a Riemann summation )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K