How were atomic masses determined before mass spectroscopy existed?

Click For Summary
Atomic masses were determined through extensive chemical reactions, weighing reactants and products, and measuring volumes. Scientists used ratios derived from reactions, such as breaking down water into hydrogen and oxygen, and established a standard element, initially oxygen, for comparison. This method involved numerous experiments to achieve consensus, despite challenges like isotopes affecting measurements. The meticulous work of early scientists laid the groundwork for the periodic table and demonstrated their commitment to accuracy in a time without modern technology. The discussion highlights the significant effort required to establish foundational scientific principles.
Kavorka
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I remember a professor mentioning something about how scientists did this when we were discussing the history of the periodic table (they originally ordered it by atomic mass). I can't seem to find an answer online without digging through a lot of stuff...there was one article on this topic specifically but the link is dead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beginning of this will give you an summary
http://library.thinkquest.org/C006439/atomic/index.htm

Bascically it was done by a lot and a lot of chemical reactions to fill in the spots -weighing reactants and products, measuring volumes.

For example, water can be broken down into its constituents, hydrogen and oxygen in gaseous phase. So weigh the products and measure the volumes, use Avogadro, and other rules, and compare the results to get a ratio. Do more experiments to get more ratios and pick one of the elements as a standard which was oxygen in the beginning on which all others were based. Note that for one reaction, such as water, one would have to consider if the products were actually H and O, H2 and O, h and O2, etc. Other experiments would lead to a consensus.
 
It is easy to forget just how hard they used to work at measuring things when they couldn't go down the road and buy a gizmo to do it. No wonder they got the initial stab at a periodic table wrong, when isotopes were messing with their measurements. A truly fantastic story, involving hundreds and hundreds of measurements, to reduce the errors.

The same approach gave them a highly accurate model of the Solar System, long before there were massive telescopes or satellites.
 
Kavorka said:
I remember a professor mentioning something about how scientists did this when we were discussing the history of the periodic table (they originally ordered it by atomic mass). I can't seem to find an answer online without digging through a lot of stuff...there was one article on this topic specifically but the link is dead.

If you are not prepared to do this at times, you will not get far in Science, young man!
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K