Loren Booda
- 3,108
- 4
As world history is decided by all peoples, wherein it will President George W. Bush eventually stand?
President George W. Bush's legacy in world history is likely to be viewed unfavorably, primarily due to his administration's handling of the economy and foreign policy, particularly the Iraq War. His response to the September 11 attacks, while initially seen as a decisive action against terrorism, may ultimately be overshadowed by the perception of his presidency as a disaster. Discussions highlight that historians and the public will likely remember him for his failures rather than successes, with significant events like 9/11 and the Iraq invasion defining his tenure.
PREREQUISITESPolitical historians, students of American history, and individuals interested in the analysis of presidential legacies and their long-term impacts on global politics.
Originally posted by Loren Booda
As world history is decided by all peoples, wherein it will President George W. Bush eventually stand?
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Probably low but not at the bottom. He will get a little raise from his speeches after 9/11...
Originally posted by russ_watters
I think its a little tough to judge now since he's not even halfway through his presidency.
Probably the world at large will see Bush's presidency as a disaster. Most Americans will too, over the course of time. How much of a disaster is up for grabs though, at least for Americans. Plus, we have to consider whether we are discussing professional historians' view, or "popular" history. After all, Nixon was both a better and worse president than popular history gives him credit for, because his presidency was defined in the common view as "Watergate". Clinton was a credible moderate Republican president, but the popular view is all "Lewinski".Originally posted by Loren Booda
How will humanity as a whole differ significantly from Americans in lasting judgement of President Bush?
A-hem! A Dem!Clinton was a credible moderate Republican president, but the popular view is all "Lewinski".
Actually, I don't. But unfortunately, there aren't any good alternatives, so his re-election is pretty much a foregone conclusion.Originally posted by selfAdjoint
You wish!
In name only.Originally posted by Loren Booda
Zero A-hem! A Dem!
He is not even nearly the only one. In fact, my understanding was that Clinton was only a Democrat because early in his career he completely alienated the Arkansas Republicans, and had little choice but to run as a Dem.Originally posted by Dimitri Terryn
Wasn't it Michael Moore who stated the Clinton was, without a doubt, the best Republican president ever?
Originally posted by Shahil
In Afrikaans, there's a word which PERFECTLY suits mr. bush. He's a DOOS!
I'm sure you enterprising guys will find out the meaning of that!
Originally posted by Dimitri Terryn
Een doos is a box in Dutch. You're saying that's an insult down there?
Originally posted by Shahil
Doos is a colloquial saying meaning something on the lines of someone really stupid. I don't speak afrikaans so can't really directly translate it but its a common saying known by most South Africans.
Sorry phatmonky but I really find it hard to respect Mr. Bush. Unfortunately he's probably the most important man in American history because of how events are panning out in the world today but still, I just can't credit him for being great AT ALL!
Originally posted by Zero
Can we get back on track here?
Originally posted by Zero
He would have been ok if he had focused troops and money in Afghanistan. Instead, he abandoned that country to the warlords, and moved on to Iraq for no logical reason.