How would you solve this problem?

  • Thread starter John Galt
  • Start date
In summary: A2) A CFM fan rating should be used to blow past the element to deliver the air at constant temperature.
  • #1
John Galt
15
0
I am sizing an electric heating element to produce a steady supply of heat. The heating element consists of a ceramic tube, coiled on the outside with resistance wire. This tube is encapsulated by another larger ceramic tube and the space between them is evacuated to help direct the heat to the air column in the tube wound with resistance wire. A fan then blows this heated air to where it is needed.

What I know is:

1) The diameter of the resistance wire.
2) The wall thickness and inside diameter of the ceramic tube coiled with resistance wire.
3) The resistivity of the wire in Ohms/ft.
4) The voltage and current running through the resistance wire.

What I don't know is:

1) How many feet of wire to wind around the ceramic tube to reach a desired temperature that remains constant.
2) Which CFM fan rating should be used to blow past the element to deliver the air at constant temperature.

I need somebody to help me figure out what I don't know from the information I do know. Am I missing anything? Any and all help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, John. Unfortunately, I can't help you. This is out of my area. I would still recommend, however, that you post the values that you do know, rather than just state that you know them. They're essential to working out your solution.
 
  • #3
Danger,
Not really. Generally actual numbers are not very important at this stage. They tend to distract from the essence of the problem.

Since you know the voltage and current, you know the resistance, therefore given the resistivity of the wire you can compute the length. I suspect that you really do not know the current, but rather a max current for your power supply. You would be well off to design your heating element to use say 80% of that. You may want to look at other constraints to see if there is some upper limit on the power you can handle.

Once you have your heater working you can then determine at what rate the air needs to be moving to get your final temperature.

To the best of my knowledge getting the final air temperature analytically is very difficult.
 
  • #4
Integral said:
To the best of my knowledge getting the final air temperature analytically is very difficult.
Trying to figure out how the convective heat transfer works is very difficult, but you can probably skip all that by making the assumption that all of the heat produced goes into heating the air. While that's true, the catch is that the temperature of the heating element will depend on the effectiveness of the heat transfer, and that can affect its operation - resistance is temperature dependent. It is also tough to know how "forgiving" the heating element is (we don't want to burn it out). But when your approach temperature is so large, big changes in the temperature of your output air don't have a very big impact on the heating element's temperature.

All that said, the answers to the two questions are dependent on each other. Your given #4 is your wattage, so if you pick a temp or airflow, you can calculate the other.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Integral said:
Danger,
Not really. Generally actual numbers are not very important at this stage.
Sorry 'bout that. :redface:
I was thinking that the desired temperature and the air flow rate at which it can be sustained would be the starting point. As I said, I don't know much about this stuff.
 
  • #6
This looks like a homework problem. Look at the two questions: They are both looking for points where the temperature would remain constant. This is true of any amount of wire and any amount of air. The constant value changes only if one of the other values is changed, wraps of wire or CFM.
 
  • #7
Very good point Artman. Determine the unit in equilibrium, then the heat flow and distribution is another set of equations based on heat transferred to the air volume in time (flow or rate.)
 
  • #8
Qleap1000 said:
Very good point Artman. Determine the unit in equilibrium, then the heat flow and distribution is another set of equations based on heat transferred to the air volume in time (flow or rate.)
Yup. I believe it would be harder to determine a specified point (number of wraps required to produce so much temperature rise, inlet to outlet, at how much CFM).

What he asked is more like a trick question on a test.
1) How many feet of wire to wind around the ceramic tube to reach a desired temperature that remains constant.
2) Which CFM fan rating should be used to blow past the element to deliver the air at constant temperature.

A1) Any number of wraps (feet) of wire can produce a temperature that remains constant.

A2) Any CFM can also produce a constant heat rise as long as the CFM remains constant.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
The stumpers questions

-and again those are very valid points that we hope John Galt is looking at.

I have stumped many a teacher with their own "BADLY" stated questions.

So, keeping all perspectives in mind is a good way to go, especially if it is an essay question which when there is enough reportoire with the teacher/proffesor you might be able to discuss the answers with the instructor afterwards in any case.
 
  • #10
russ_watters said:
Trying to figure out how the convective heat transfer works is very difficult, but you can probably skip all that by making the assumption that all of the heat produced goes into heating the air. While that's true, the catch is that the temperature of the heating element will depend on the effectiveness of the heat transfer, and that can affect its operation - resistance is temperature dependent. It is also tough to know how "forgiving" the heating element is (we don't want to burn it out). But when your approach temperature is so large, big changes in the temperature of your output air don't have a very big impact on the heating element's temperature.

All that said, the answers to the two questions are dependent on each other. Your given #4 is your wattage, so if you pick a temp or airflow, you can calculate the other.
In my DIRECT experience, the resistance of Nichrome is not extremely temperature dependent. That is how you are able to reliably design a heating element. If it were otherwise it would be very difficult to maintain a temperature.

A fellow I worked for a few years back was certain that there would be a strong temperature dependence in Nichrome. To test it we spooled of ~30ft (10m) of Nichrome and measured its resistance cold, then but current to it and measured a voltage drop when it was hot. There was barely a measurable change in the resistance. We then designed our furnace with a constant resistivity in mind, and it worked exactly as designed. Note that I have specified the Heater wire we used, this is pretty commonly used and I will bet that other heater element wire is of a similar nature.
 
  • #11
I'll let someone else give the means for calculating the amount of wire to give a specific wattage, it sounds like Integral and some of the others have a better handle on that than I would, and just help out with the heat rise of the air.

If your air is entering at or near standard conditions, this calculation will give you the temperature rise of the air.

TD = MBH/CFM/.00108

TD = Temperature difference
MBH = 1000 btu = 3412 Watts

Say for a moment you have enough resistance to give 3 KW,
this would be 3 x 3412watts = 10236, or 10.236 MBH
and 500 CFM

500/10.236/.00108 = 18.96 deg F TD.

Lower the CFM to 400 and the calculation becomes:

400/10.236/.00108 = 23.7 deg F TD.

Or raise the length of element to deliver 5.0 KW and the calculation using 500 CFM becomes:

500/17.06/.00108 = 31.6 deg F TD.

You see how changing either the CFM or the KW results in a change in the TD?
 
  • #12
Integral said:
In my DIRECT experience, the resistance of Nichrome is not extremely temperature dependent. That is how you are able to reliably design a heating element. If it were otherwise it would be very difficult to maintain a temperature.
Good to know.
 

1. How do you approach problem solving as a scientist?

As a scientist, I approach problem solving by first identifying the problem and breaking it down into smaller, more manageable parts. Then, I gather data and evidence through research and experiments. I also consider alternative solutions and their potential outcomes before deciding on the best course of action.

2. What steps do you take to solve a problem in your field of expertise?

In my field of expertise, I typically follow the scientific method. This involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experiments, analyzing the data, and drawing conclusions. I also collaborate with other experts and gather feedback to ensure the best solution is reached.

3. How do you prioritize and manage different approaches to a problem?

Prioritizing and managing different approaches to a problem involves considering the potential impact and feasibility of each approach. I also take into account the available resources and time constraints. Communication with my team and evaluating the potential risks and benefits of each approach also helps in making an informed decision.

4. Can you provide an example of a successful problem-solving experience in your career?

One successful problem-solving experience in my career was when I was working on a project to develop a new medication. We encountered unexpected results during the initial testing phase, and I had to lead a team to identify the root cause of the issue. Through thorough research and experimentation, we were able to find a solution and successfully develop the medication.

5. How do you handle setbacks or challenges during the problem-solving process?

Setbacks and challenges are inevitable during the problem-solving process, and as a scientist, I understand the importance of remaining calm and objective. I reassess the situation and gather more data if needed. I also seek input from my team and consider alternative approaches. In some cases, it may be necessary to take a step back and approach the problem from a different angle.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
607
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
736
  • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
442
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
1K
Back
Top