Hubble's Law: Explaining Why Distant Bodies Recede Faster

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein's Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble's law Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on Hubble's Law, specifically exploring the reasons behind the observation that distant celestial bodies recede faster from us. Participants engage with both the theoretical implications and the philosophical aspects of this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Hubble's Law is a consequence of the universe being homogeneous and isotropic.
  • Others question whether a homogeneous and isotropic universe necessarily leads to an increasing recessional velocity with distance, proposing that constant recessional velocities could still maintain homogeneity.
  • A participant emphasizes that for the universe to be homogeneous, the recession velocity must be proportional to distance, aligning with Hubble's Law.
  • One participant references the 'balloon analogy' as a way to conceptualize the relationship between distance and recessional velocity in a homogeneous universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the characteristics of a homogeneous and isotropic universe adequately explain Hubble's Law. There is no consensus on the underlying reasons for the law's existence, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of homogeneity and isotropy are not fully explored, and the discussion includes unresolved questions about the implications of constant versus increasing recessional velocities.

Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
I am aware of the philosophical annotations with this question as some argue that science should only serve to explain how physical systems occur and not why; however if this question is not confined to this then I hope that there are answers. Is there an explanation to why Hubble's law exist? Or in other words, why is it the case that the further a body is from us, the faster it receeds from us?
 
Space news on Phys.org
It's because the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. A homogeneous, isotropic universe follows Hubble's law.

As to why it's homogeneous and isotropic, that's a harder question to answer. It seems likely that there was some mechanism that allowed the observable universe to come into equilibrium early-on, so that it had nearly the same density and temperature everywhere.
 
Chalnoth said:
It's because the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. A homogeneous, isotropic universe follows Hubble's law.
Please excuse my ignorance but it seems to me that a homogeneous and isotropic universe could be maintained even if the recessional velocity of anybody was constant and did not increase as the body gets further from us. Thus, I think that this doesn't explain the existence of Hubble's Law. Please correct me however.
 
Einstein's Cat said:
Please excuse my ignorance but it seems to me that a homogeneous and isotropic universe could be maintained even if the recessional velocity of anybody was constant and did not increase as the body gets further from us. Thus, I think that this doesn't explain the existence of Hubble's Law. Please correct me however.
If the recession velocity isn't proportional to distance, then it isn't homogeneous.

Remember, to be homogeneous, it has to maintain the property that if you move to another location, the universe looks the same from that location.
 
Einstein's Cat said:
Please excuse my ignorance but it seems to me that a homogeneous and isotropic universe could be maintained even if the recessional velocity of anybody was constant and did not increase as the body gets further from us.
Adding to what Chalnoth wrote, in a homogeneous universe, a galaxy that is twice as distant from us must recede at twice the rate of the nearer one, and so on. This is Hubble's law. If the reason is not clear to you, please Google the 'balloon analogy'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K