Human Intestines: Comparing Worms & Humans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pranav Jha
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion compares the intestinal structures of earthworms (order Haplotaxida, suborder Lumbricina) and humans, highlighting the efficiency of the earthworm's digestive system. Earthworms possess a crop, gizzard, and a long intestine filled with blood vessel-rich projections that facilitate nutrient extraction. Their digestive efficiency is attributed to a symbiotic relationship with bacteria, allowing them to process organic matter effectively. In contrast, humans have a more complex and less efficient digestive system, resulting in less nutrient extraction and odoriferous waste.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic digestive anatomy and physiology
  • Knowledge of symbiotic relationships in biology
  • Familiarity with the role of bacteria in digestion
  • Concept of surface area to volume ratio in biological organisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the digestive systems of other organisms for comparative analysis
  • Study the role of gut microbiota in human digestion
  • Explore the process of nutrient absorption in various species
  • Investigate the ecological impact of earthworm castings on soil health
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, ecologists, students studying anatomy and physiology, and anyone interested in comparative digestive systems and their ecological implications.

Pranav Jha
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Nourishment is obtained from food through the inner surface area of the intestines. Why is it that a small organism, such as a worm, has a simple and relatively straight intestinal tract, while a large organism, such as a human being, has a complex and extensively folded intestinal tract?

i think this has to with greater surface area to volume ration of earthworm and thus a higher metabolic rate but i am not sure.
Please give a coherent answer
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I think you are right.
 
Pranav Jha said:
Nourishment is obtained from food through the inner surface area of the intestines. Why is it that a small organism, such as a worm, has a simple and relatively straight intestinal tract, while a large organism, such as a human being, has a complex and extensively folded intestinal tract?

i think this has to with greater surface area to volume ration of earthworm and thus a higher metabolic rate but i am not sure.
Please give a coherent answer

Earthworms (order Haplotaxida, suborder Lumbricina) have a crop, gizzard and intestine. Food is stored in the crop, passed to the gizzard where it is ground up and enzymes are added, and the intestine actually extracts the nutrition. The intestine runs most of the length of the body, it has thousands of projections that are filled with blood vessels.

The main thing to understand is that earthworms have a special relationship with bacteria. Yes, humans have lots of flora and fauna in our guts too, but worms basically swim in a sea of bacteria. They are at the top of their food chain and the enzymes secreted in the intestine work with the bacteria so that the earthworm gets its nutrition but many beneficial bacteria will pass through unharmed. Most pathogenic bacteria are destroyed.

I'm not a biologist and I am trying to give you a coherent answer. My understanding is that the specifics of this bacterial/enzymatic system are poorly understood on a detailed level.

My best answer is that it's not a matter of metabolic rate per se but a matter of efficiency and simplicity.

The worm's digestive system is highly evolved and efficient and there are normally no microorganisms it cannot deal with. On the other hand, we are omnivores with much less efficient systems. Our feces stink because there is so much organic matter that we could not extract nutrition from. Earthworm castings are essentially "perfect" feces in that they consist of "completely broken down" organic material, where the minerals are highly available to plant rootlets. The castings are also coated with a mucus consisting of (IINM) live bacteria that do great things for the soil.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K