Hydraulics instead of internal combustion engine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of a hydraulic system being tested by UPS to power a torque converter for delivery vehicles, with a focus on the feasibility of integrating this system with an electrically powered motor. Participants are examining the potential of energy recovery and storage methods in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that UPS is experimenting with hydraulics to recapture energy during braking to assist an internal combustion engine (ICE) during acceleration.
  • Others clarify that the system discussed may not be purely hydraulic, as it involves compressed gas, which could potentially offer higher efficiency in energy recovery compared to traditional methods.
  • A participant notes that the proposed system might achieve about 70% efficiency in energy recapture, contrasting with the 35% efficiency of conventional generators and batteries.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the specifics of the system, including whether it is intended to be powered solely by an electric motor or in conjunction with an ICE.
  • Some participants express confusion about the original question and seek clarification on the intended focus of the discussion.
  • Concerns about packaging and practical implementation of the energy storage system are raised, particularly regarding the use of accumulators.
  • A historical reference is made to earlier models of similar systems tested in city buses, illustrating the long-standing interest in energy recovery technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specifics of the UPS system, with multiple competing views on its design and functionality remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of hydraulic versus compressed gas systems, as well as the efficiency claims and practical implementation challenges that have not been fully explored.

avemt1
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
i recently heard that ups is designing and testing a hydraulic system to power a torque converter for an efficient delivery system i need to know the validity of the situation and the plausibility of it being run by an electrically powered motor.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Haven't heard or seen anything about this. Any more information?
 
I can't remember where I saw the articles but I've heard of this. UPS is essentially looking at experimenting with equipping a small portion of their truck fleet with hydraulics to recapture and store energy used during braking and then use it to assist the ICE during acceleration. I have no idea if they're even past the "still talking about it" stage.
 
Francis M said:
I can't remember where I saw the articles but I've heard of this. UPS is essentially looking at experimenting with equipping a small portion of their truck fleet with hydraulics to recapture and store energy used during braking and then use it to assist the ICE during acceleration. I have no idea if they're even past the "still talking about it" stage.

I read about this in Pro-Sci as a next-gen hybrid system, it's not really a "hydraulic" system though, it uses compressed gas. Rather than using a generator and batteries to recapture energy (which is about 35% efficient) a company proposed using a compressor attached to the driveline that pressurizes nitrogen between a "low pressure" tank and a "high pressure" tank during braking. Then, they run the compressor in reverse during acceleration to help the IC engine. The idea is that this system for recapturing energy will be about 70% efficient.

I think I also read that UPS will be doing prototype testing. In the end it isn't a complete ICE replacement, it is a non-electric hybrid system.
 
...not really a "hydraulic" system though, it uses compressed gas
Unless it's a newer evrsion of this:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3165/is_2002_Feb_1/ai_87847732
which is an hydraulic system used to compress a gas.
 
So an accumulator? Sounds like a nice enough idea, packaging is always an issue with such things though.

What did the OP mean about it being powered electrically? Just an electric motor rather than an IC engine?
 
I'm not sure. Now that I've read the OP again it does seem a little confusing.

avemt1

Are you asking about how the system UPS is looking into works or are you asking if it could be used other than with an ICE?
Please, if you could, clarify the original question so the forum can gear the answers more towards what you're expecting for information. Thanks.
 
Energy recovery and Storage

Yes, in the final annalysis of Recovery and Storage of energy there are many (fuzzy) ways of doing it with many ideas. The largest question always seems to be how to store the captured energy and redestribute it in a proper usable fashion.
 
How do they convert the compressed air/gas into momentum? Aim it backwards and use it as a rocket?:cool:
 
  • #10
denni89627 said:
How do they convert the compressed air/gas into momentum? Aim it backwards and use it as a rocket?:cool:
That would be a tad inefficient (and loud!). :biggrin:
The gas would be used to store pressure in the hydraulic system, which can then be used to turn a hydraulic motor (which can be the pump run in reverse).
 
Last edited:
  • #11
In the first model I ever saw (which was more than 15 years ago) was being test-run in some place like Norway or perhaps Denmark. Thay were putting it in city busses, and it was a very simple mechanism. Gears connected the wheels to a piston that ran the entire length of the bus (underneath), and when hte breaks were applied the wheels pushed the piston into a cylinder that had no vent, compressing the air inside.

When the break was released and the accelerator stepped on, the gearing between the piston and the wheel was reversed, allowing the expanding gasses inside the cylinder to push the wheels in a forward direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
9K